View more on these topics

‘FSA never wanted to ban interest-only’

FSA director of conduct policy Sheila Nicoll says it is not the regulator’s intention to ban interest-only mortgages.

It has proposed that interest-only borrowers should be assessed on a capital and repayment basis and has suggested that lenders should check to see if the customer has a suitable repayment vehicle in place to pay back the capital at the end of the mortgage.

At the Council of Mortgage Lenders’ Mortgage Industry Conference and Exhibition, Nicoll said people have misunderstood the message on interest-only mortgages.
She said the FSA recognises interest-only loans are suitable for some borrowers.

She said: “There is a myth around interest-only. Our discussion paper simply stated affordability could be better measured if each assessment was made on a capital and interest basis and there was support for this.

“But a number of industry voices wanted us to apply additional measures, so our July consultation asked in a very open way what those measures might be, including whether any action was necessary at all.

“We were a little surprised that with these open questions, the magic wand suddenly turned into the regulator’s big stick, threatening to move interest-only out of the market.

“You only have to read the consultation paper to see that a ban was never our view. We have always acknowledged that interest-only can be a sensible option for some consumers.”

MoneyQuest managing director Simon Jackson says: “It is a product in the armoury which has a use in the marketplace and, if used responsibly, it is a useful product for a number of people. It is not right for everybody but for some it is. I welcome the fact the FSA understand that.”

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Sheila, it should be a matter for the lender and the borrower to decide what terms are suitable, it would be really wonderful if the regulator was independent and took little notice of what HM Treasury hands down to them for implementation after the banks fall down a hole.

    The problem was wholesale funding, a wall of money looking for a home, if this had been stemmed early on by the regulators the mess we see before us now might not have been so immense.

  2. Seems a reasonable position for the FSA to take. Referring to the previous comment, how exactly should the regulator have stemmed the tide of wholesale funding, assuming that conduct of business tools were inappropriate?

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com