View more on these topics

FSA insists it will not speed up FSCS review

The FSA has reiterated its stance on reviewing the FSCS, saying that it cannot speed up the process until regulation in Europe is finalised.

Speaking at the All-party Parliamentary Group on Insurance and Financial Services yesterday, FSA director of conduct policy Sheila Nicoll said it is “fairly unlikely” that completing the review process by April 2012 would sufficiently resolve the issue. “We would have to consult for three months,” said Nicoll. “We want any changes to be sustainable and not throw up problems elsewhere.”

She cited delays in the Deposit Guarantee Scheme Directive and the Investor Compensation Scheme Directive as factors affecting the review. “Discussions around deposits are due on July 4,” she said. “A lot of the principles surrounding the FSCS review will be included. We hope to be able to take matters forward once there is certainty there.”

APPG chair Jonathan Evans pointed out that there is uncertainty surrounding European issues. “We have no timescale as to when agreement will be reached in Europe,” he said. “The FSA recognised the need for a review in 2009. We are not beating the FSA up to carry out the review. It knows we need one.”

Nicoll assured the APPG that the FSCS review would take place “relatively quickly” because of the FSA’s previous work, saying: “We have had chats around some of the issues such as cross-subsidising and sub-classes.”

Nicoll also stated that there are duties on the part of the FSCS to claim recoveries from third parties which would then be credited back to levy payers. Evans responded that this was “cold comfort to high street brokers whose bills are five times greater.”

Thameside Wealth Management director Tom Kean says: “It is another kick in the nether regions. Maybe the FSA should consider giving us some good news for once.”

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 7 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Very interesting argument. let’s extend it it somewhat.

    Let’s leave the RDR proposals in dry dock until we know what’s going on in Europe.

  2. Thanks, Alan. You beat me to it.

  3. The most depressing thing is, in all probability, she cannot understand how she has shot herself in the foot by Alan’s obvious point .
    Perhaps she should award herself a higher salary which is the FSA’s answer to any criticism for its ongoing failings.

  4. Ms Nicolls – you really have no idea what you are doing do you?

  5. Exasperated me 15th June 2011 at 4:13 pm

    Booze run up brewery couldn’t…

  6. So the FSA it cannot speed up the process until regulation in Europe is finalised and yet when it comes to RDR then can speed up the process before regulation in Europe is finalised!

  7. Julian Stevens 16th June 2011 at 9:36 am

    FSCS review? Foot on the brake pedal.

    RDR? Foot hard down on the throttle pedal.

    But then when did we ever get consistency from the FSA?

Leave a comment