View more on these topics

FSA in the slow lane

Paul Farrow says history shows the regulator has been reactive rather than proactive.

Paul Farrow Farrow’s View

It would seem as though the FSA has seen the light following chief executive Hector Sants’ admission that treating customers fairly has “not delivered the outcomes that consumers deserve.”

Sants says its excuse for its failing is that “old-style” consumer protection regulation is, in his view, largely reactive, not proactive. Given that Sants joined the FSA five years ago, I am surprised it has taken him so long to work out that the regulator has been behind the curve all too often. He may boast of having collecting record fines in the past year but its record of being ahead of the game are few and far between.
The FSA has always been slow when it comes to protecting consumers and it continues to this day – the structured product and Lehman investigation being the latest example.

But go back over its lifetime and there are other cases where the FSA has been slow to grasp a problem. It refused to acknowledge there was a mortgage endowment problem and rejected calls for a full-scale review. It was several months before it heeded warnings in the press that precipice bonds were being sold by the shedload by bank advisers to the vulnerable.

Split-capital investment trusts were off its radar for some time after the collapse of the sector. It even disputed it was a “retail’ problem, although the 50,000 investors caught up in the saga confirmed otherwise.

Sants says he will be judged by results and by outcomes, which he believes that he has achieved over the last two years.

He says at the beginning of the year he wrote to bosses of firms asking them to stop selling single-premium PPI with unsecured loans -an area of the market with the highest risk to consumers, he says. He boasts of how the FSA agreed an indus-trywide package of measures for MPPI consumers, including refunds of £60m.

This is a hollow boast, as Sants should know, and is, perhaps, the biggest example of the regulator being reactive rather than proactive.
Which? reported problems with PPI almost 20 years ago in 1990 and has been fighting the consumer’s corner on the issue in earnest for years. The FSA has also long been aware of the problems of PPI. In its own investigation in 2005, it found that many PPI policies were “inappropriately” sold. It said salespeople were being elastic with the truth when it came to reveal the true cost and, crucially, under what circumstances people will not be eligible to claim.

Sants also asks us to judge him on the FSA’s major mortgage reforms as “another good example, which demonstrates the value our integrated approach brings”. But yet again, the horse has long since bolted and they will not address the problems caused by the Noughties’ housing boom and an era of reckless lending.

Consumers can take a smidgeon of comfort that the FSA has shown tentative signs it can be proactive. It caught up with venture capital trust industry for over-egging VCT tax benefits, it has been hot on the heels of equity-release providers and has been keeping a close eye on the growing Sipp market.

Consumers can also take some comfort that the FSA has recognised its TCF initiative has failed and that it has kicked into touch its misconceived light-touch approach to regulation.

They now stand a better chance of being given the level of protection that the City regulator owes them.

Paul Farrow is digital personal finance editor at the Telegraph Media Group

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. There are more gaps out there than there are in a sieve.

    However, some would contend that the problems lie in the defective legislation that the regulator is empowered by while at the same time being constrained within. All the “new powers” in the world won’t make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear of an Act.

    All this is coupled with the ‘only we are right’ culture of the regulators and the regulated, then add the failure of both parties to work together instead of firing off threats at each other, it makes for a bowl of bitter gruel that journalists and consumer lobby groups feed upon. Without all this there would be a few empty column inches I am sure!

    Let’s hope the ‘tentative signs that it can be proactive’ message gets through to the core of the regulator, this can only work if it engages on equal terms with those who may be able to help.

  2. The axiom of ‘Proactive’ in empire building is more bodies and even greater cost @ the FSA.

    The current cost of regulation is such that it impacts heavily on investment return,

    I think the Conservative Party have the right idea, close down the FSA, but even this is pie in the sky as our masters in Brussels would prevent it.

    Barlow Clouds and the like, were thieves but they were more cost effective than their replacement.

    A sad case of the ‘Cure being more deadly than the malady’.

  3. Paul, it’s not so matter that its “light touch” regulation – more that its been institutionally incompetent regulation and the result of “regulatory capture”, and so delivering a ‘light’ burden to big companies with ample resources but a pretty hefty regulatory burden to small firms.

    I would suggest that a model that would better serve the retail space would be something of a half-way-House between the Tories’ proposed CPA and Fimbra: a small organisation run by consumer representatives AND practitioners, looking to benchmark good IFA practice and provide advisers with some regulatory certainty in the form of clear and constructive GUIDANCE.

    Frankly, none of the examples you cite would have come as any surprise to a dozen or so IFAs talking shop over a beer every month or so. Whilst nobody has a monopoly on predicting these things, IFAs can be quite good at identifying *potential* issues in a way that career regulators seem incapable of.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com