View more on these topics

FSA forces PPI firms to reopen 185,000 rejected complaints

The FSA is forcing firms that sold PPI to review 185,000 previously rejected complaints and redress any consumers who have been missold under new guidance.

In addition, firms representing more than 40 per cent of face-to-face sales in the single premium unsecured personal loan PPI market have agreed to the review their sales and redress consumers where required.

The regulator’s new guidance on PPI sales, due to take effect by the end of the year, aims to ensure PPI complaints are handled properly and redressed fairly where appropriate.

The FSA says too many complaints are rejected by firms and then overturned by the Financial Ombudsman Service in favour of the consumer.

The measure, announced today, builds on the agreement the FSA obtained from the industry earlier this year to stop selling single premium PPI on unsecured loans.

In addition, the FSA is launching targeted assessment of sales practices for PPI on secured loans and credit cards.

If the potential for misselling is identified, the FSA says pro-active reviews by firms may be extended to these areas too.

FSA managing director of retail markets Jon Pain says: “Consumers should not be pressured or deceived into buying PPI and they are entitled to have a policy properly explained to them. It is unacceptable that despite previous warnings about poor sales practices, backed by 22 enforcement cases and significant fines, the PPI sector still needs the FSA to intervene on this. And the outcome of a complaint about a PPI sale should not depend on whether or not the complainant persists past the firm on to the FOS.

“This is the last chance for the industry to show that it can act fairly, consistently and in the best interest of consumers on PPI. All firms operating in this sector should take note and where necessary get their house in order. Where we find questionable practices in sales or complaint handling, firms can expect that we will take action.”

Financial Services Consumer Panel chairman Adam Phillips says: “The selling of PPI has a notorious history. We welcome the FSA’s proposal today to force firms to re-visit all rejected complaints about sales of PPI and re-examine them against new FSA guidance.

“However, this action has taken a long time and the FSA still needs to tackle PPI sold with credit cards, secured loans and mortgages where people may not have complained. We also still await FSA enforcement action against individuals in some of the bigger players who were responsible for the mis-selling of PPI.”

Recommended

FSA in keyword warning

The FSA and the Office of Fair Trading have warned financial firms against the use of false or misleading keywords on their websites to boost search engine rankings.

1

Mortgage lending up £1bn

Mortgage lending went back into positive figures this month rising by more than £1bn, according to the Bank of England.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. FSA forces single premium PPI firms to reopen 185,000 rejected complaints
    Better late than never, I suppose, even if it is extremely late. Were such action being taken against IFA firms, you can bet your bottom dollar that the FSA would have come down a lot harder, a lot more heavily and a lot more quickly. I wonder when, if ever, the FSA will start taking action on the banks’ standard “investment” advice of flogging 90% of customers with more than £10,000 in any sort of cash savings account a 5 year Guaranteed Investment Bond on 7.5% commission? And what has the FSA done about the cases of all those risk averse customers steered from cash into that Aviva balanced global growth fund which then slid 30% down in a very short space of time? Nothing much, if anything, as far as I can tell. Too busy prioritising the RDR over everything else.

  2. FSA forces PPI firms to reopen 185,000 rejected complaints
    When will we have a Regulator who can regulate, not a retrospective Regulator! This is ridiculous at any time!! Also, I was pleased to note Mr Darling’s speech regarding ‘Bonus Culture’. No doubt the FSA will be well positioned to ensure they do not pay ANY Bonus to themselves next year as they oversee the Banks and the justification required!!! Saving another £14M+.

  3. FSA forces review of PPI sales
    Why has it taken so long to have this issue properly investigated and, eventually, to get some action from the FSA. Even when the FSA is led by the nose it seems incredibly slow at doing anything useful.
    And why is it not extending this to mortgages where the PPI premiums have been horrendous and where mis-selling has been the order of the day for the banks and even many IFAs ? Is the FSA worried about coming down on the boys at Northern Rock and RBS and some of the other serial offenders ?

Leave a comment