View more on these topics

FSA fines wholesale insurer £3.3m

The FSA has fined the London-based subsidiary of a Japanese insurance firm £3.3m for serious corporate governance failings, and fined and banned its former executive chairman £119,303.

Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company (Europe) is the London-based division of Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company, part of one of the world’s largest non-life insurance groups.

MSIEu historically supplied wholesale insurance cover to Japanese firms operating in Europe and the Middle East.  From 2007 it expanded into non-Japanese business and by the end of 2010 half its premiums came from non-Japanese firms, much of it from branches in France and Germany.

In April 2009 Yohichi Kumagai was seconded from the Japanese parent company and appointed as executive chairman of MSIEu. Typically they had only limited experience of non-Japanese insurance business and UK regulatory obligations.

Shortly after his appointment the FSA wrote to Kumagai and MSIEu stating expansion into European markets would need careful and focused oversight from an appropriately skilled and experienced board. The regulator also said the firm’s systems and controls would also have to be improved to identify and address the risks posed by their new area of business.

The FSA says despite its clear guidance on the ineffective structure of the board, Kumagai failed to ensure key posts at MSIEu were staffed adequately. He failed to hire a chief underwriting officer, which then made it more difficult to control the expansion of the business. Kumagai also did not ensure the effective and timely implementation of a new IT administration system across the firm’s branch offices which led to shortcomings in the management information available to the board.

FSA acting director of enforcement and financial crime Tracey McDermott says: “Kumagai failed to respond adequately to the changing risks facing his business even after they had been pointed out by the FSA.  If those who hold senior positions in financial services firms had had any doubt about how seriously we view their regulatory responsibilities this fine and ban should make our position crystal clear.

“The FSA requires firms to have effective corporate governance and controls. They must adapt these appropriately to reflect changes in their risk profile, especially growth into new areas.”


95% Of St James’s Place advisers now at level 4

St James’s Place says 95 per cent of its advisers are either RDR-qualified or are close to achieving their RDR qualification. Chief executive David Bellamy says the task of getting all advisers to QCF level four in time for the RDR deadline is “virtually done”. As at the end of December, the total number of […]

CBI forecasts UK growth in second half of the year

The UK economy will see growth in the second half of the year after falling into recession in the first quarter, according to the Confederation of British Industry. It predicts gross domestic product will grow by 0.6 per cent this year, slightly down from its forecast of 0.9 per cent in February. The revision comes […]

NewBuy flawed

Paul Thomas reports problems are already starting as rates rise on the Government’s much heralded scheme


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. What are the potential job opportunities for senior FSA Execs. at a company such as MSIEu. Probably unlikely to offer sufficiently high salary packages so giving them a rap over the knuckles won’t affect future job prospects much. They are therefore presumably considered fair game, an easy way for the regulator to gain ‘Brownie Points’.

Leave a comment