View more on these topics

FSA fines mortgage network directors £60k

FSA Front 480

The FSA has fined and banned three former directors of the liquidated Black and White Group for numerous failings in relation to the sale of mortgages and payment protection insurance.

The FSA has censured the firm for operating in a way that created a very high risk of unsuitable sales and for failing to treat customers fairly. Had the firm not been liquidated in 2008 the FSA would have fined it £2.2m. 

Chairman Christopher Ollerenshaw and chief executive Thomas Reeh challenged the decisions of the FSA in the Upper Tribunal.

The Tribunal agreed with the FSA that Ollerenshaw should be banned and fined £100,000, although this was subsequently reduced to £50,000 on grounds of financial hardship.

However, while the Tribunal agreed that Reeh should be fined £75,000 – which was reduced to £10,000 once financial hardship was taken into account – it judged that he should not be banned in the light of mitigating circumstances.

Chief operating officer Adrian Childs has also been banned from holding a senior position in regulated financial services because he did not understand, or take steps to understand, how to perform his role.

Childs would have been fined £50,000 but was declared bankrupt in 2009.

Black and White primarily advised on and arranged mortgage contracts, with many of its customers ‘sub-prime’ with low or impaired credit ratings.

The firm had a panel of over 20 mortgage lenders and purported to consider all of them when advising on a mortgage.

Instead, Ollerenshaw and Reeh encouraged sales advisers to sell a particular lender’s mortgages without considering whether the particular lender’s products were the best for customers. 

Black and White also had a £1m loan facility from the particular lender. In 2007, when Black and White had difficulty making repayments on the £1m loan it offset outstanding repayments on this loan against commissions due from the increased mortgage business with the particular lender.

Black and White also put undue pressure on advisers to sell PPI to its customers.   

Reeh imposed a target for sales without proper regard to the suitability of the product for its consumers. This was driven by an incentive scheme that meant greater commission could be earned by selling single premium policies over regular premium policies.

The FSA’s director of enforcement and financial crime Tracey McDermott says: “The failings of Ollerenshaw, Reeh and Childs are serious. 

“The way in which they ran B&W led to customers being treated unfairly. Both the incentive scheme and the culture at the firm encouraged staff to focus on sales rather than suitability.  We expect firms to put customers at the heart of their business. Getting sales incentives right is critical to that. Firms that fail to do so can expect us to take action against them.”


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 7 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Its companys like Black & White that have caused the compliance over-load we now see; this is one occasion I can say well done to the FSA for their actions. There is never an excuse to put profits before a client as without looking after a client properly, we don’t have a worth while business!

  2. Err, why aren’t they going to jail?

  3. Black & White were operating for MANY years and I complained to FSA about them at least seven years ago.

  4. But have they banned anyone from HSBC for laundering Mexican drug money or Iranian money? Have they ****

  5. The FSA has got it right on this one it would seem. It’s a shame that 99% honest, ethical advisers have to jump through hoops and get buried in red tape just to get rid of the 1% bad apples. Still, it keeps the FSA big wigs in the lap of luxury so we mustn’t complain. Good luck Hector – you useless shite !

  6. Who is the ‘particular lender’? They areas culpable as the broker….

  7. You will have to explain to me why the regulator failed to manage this when it was going on. This is like PPI, everyone in the business new it was going on except the people ripping millions and millions of pounds out of the industry. They should making themselves redundant for failing the consumer, not issuing pointless after the horse has bolted and then died penalties. These do not solve or repair any of the damage that the FSA allowed through negligence.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm