View more on these topics

FSA fines and bans mortgage broker for fraud

The Financial Services Authority has fined and banned a Bromley mortgage broker for fraud.

Dele MacAulay has been fined £115,157 for knowingly submitting nine fraudulent mortgage applications for himself, his wife, and his brother.

MacAulay, trading as Dele MacAulay Financial Services, has now been banned from working in regulated financial services. He has also been sentenced to 21-months in prison for his activities.

The FSA’s investigation showed that MacAulay processed nine fraudulent mortgage applications with false income and employment information. Five were residential mortgages for himself, two were residential mortgages for his wife, and two residential mortgages for his brother.

MacAulay also submitted false tax information to the FSA in his retail mediation activities return.

FSA director of enforcement and financial crime Margaret Cole says: “MacAulay abused his position as a mortgage broker for personal gain, but he was caught and has paid a heavy price. This fine and ban reflect the seriousness of his failings as well as the FSA’s attitude to those who abuse their approved status.   

“This case is also a good example of the benefits of a collaborative approach with the police.  Between us we have dealt with MacAulay decisively and justice has been done.”

The FSA’s investigation was conducted alongside a criminal investigation by Hertfordshire Constabulary also looking into mortgage fraud committed by MacAulay.


Candles in the wind

Unfortunately, I am old enough to remember the miners’s strikes and the three-day weeks of the 1970s. I recall, as children, that when the power went off we would sit round my mum’s gas oven in the dark to keep warm. Candles were in short supply in those days and some localshops even rationed them. […]


Inflation proofing

Learn from the world of investments, where the cardinal rule is don’t put all of your eggs in the same basket.

Fidelity’s share buying move could stop the stags

Winterflood Securities head of research Simon Elliot says Fidelity’s decision to buy its own shares on an ad hoc basis may prevent investors stagging Anthony Bolton’s China special situations trust. Fidelity has had a special resolution passed to make market purchases of up to 14.99 per cent of its own issued shares following the conclusion […]

Annuity income data

The Retirement Strategy data pages are designed to offer a wide ranging view of the current annuity rates being offered from providers including impaired, flexible and asset-backed annuity options. The pages also put current rates into historical context, offer the latest annuity best-buy tables and give a general overview of the type of products each […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 12 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. And the RDR doesn’t cover mortgages?

    Why is that?

  2. Incompetent Regulators Awards Team 2nd March 2010 at 5:18 pm

    What about fining staff FSA for c*ck ups? It’s about time these people were made acountable for their slack work. e.g. Lets start with the banks shall we? In which case if things were proportionate and commensurate with the scale of their failures, they would all lose their homes many moons ago! But hey we are under Labour so they all get fat salaries, big bonuses and expenses on my fees

    They just make me laugh. Who are they trying to kid about regulations?

  3. Victor Meldrew 2nd March 2010 at 5:37 pm

    Can someone explain to me what RDR has to do with a dishonest person making fraudulent mortgage applications for his own and his family’s benefit?

    Perhaps he should have charged himself a fee to pay for him taking and passing the exams but he would still have been a crook although a fee charging well qualified crook.

  4. How will a read across of RDR to mortgages prevent this happening?

  5. I hope this is only the start of a very long list of dishonest brokers whose new rightful address is HMP.

  6. Victor – you’re way off the mark, RDR is nothing to do with mortgages…

  7. I seem to member some time ago that the BBC ran a program showing bank employees helping individuals falsify mortgage applications (i.e. caught on camera). However, I don’t seem to remember seeing anything about these individuals or their employers being punished by the FSA.

    Why is that?

  8. Man submits a few false mortgage applications and, as far as I can tell, no-one looses out – 21 months in prison.

    Someone breaks into your home and ties up your family – suspended scentence.

    Makes you proud to be British!

  9. How on earth can you pin the blatant dishonesty of a bad apple on FSA c*ck ups?

    The FSA and the banks have a lot to answer for, but using this article as a stick to hit them with just cheapens your cause

  10. This man, and others like him, should be dealt with severely by the justice system. That is why he was brought before the Crown Court, tried fairly, convicted, and sent to prison. It is no doubt arguable that he should be relieved of his unjust profit but that power was available to the trial judge as a fine – either in addition to or in lieu of a custodial sentence.

    What should concern us is the FSA’s belief that it stands astride the courts, and is empowered to impose further penalties – so the offender is punished twice for the same crime.

    Not for the first time, the regulator’s stance raises constitutional issues that go far beyond the immediate matter of one broker’s dishonesty.

  11. In all of these cases, the FSA never state whether payments on the mortgage were kept up or if lenders actually lost all the money they lent because it was misappropriated. Is this 21 months in prison for lying on a mortgage application form that all of the borrowers actually made payments on and kept up to date or is it stealing the funds from the advance and shafting the lender?

    If payments were made, then a lender has made a profit from an illegal transaction. I’m not slinging blame around at all as this guy should be punished but wouldn’t that be a bit strange?

  12. Do you have to pay a fine to the f.s.a if youhave been caught mis-selling morgages could you also go to prison.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm