View more on these topics

FSA fines and bans director over £2m insurance fraud

The FSA has fined Surety Guarantee Consultants Limited director Barry Williams £25,000 for his role in a scheme that defrauded London market insurers of more than £2m.

The regulator says that while Williams was not directly involved in the fraud, he ignored his responsibilities as an approved person by turning a blind eye despite clear warnings about the true nature of the scheme.

SGC was established in 2004 to write a form of insurance known as surety bonds. SGC held binding authorities with London market insurers, Markel and QBE – through its agent Amalfi – between January 2005 and August 2006.

SGC wrote business that exceeded its authorised limits, exposing Markel and QBE to greater liabilities than previously agreed. This resulted in SGC making secret profits and withheld over £2 million that should have been paid to the insurers.

When audited by the insurers, SGC also produced false documents which said it had kept within the terms of the binding authorities.

Despite not profiting from the scheme, Williams was found to be ignoring serious concerns about signing surety bonds on behalf of the insurers that were in excess of the limits agreed. He was also found to be lying to insurers in a bid to hide the scheme.

The fine was lowered from £50,000 by The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) to £25,000 in light of Williams’ personal circumstances, however, it upheld the decision to ban him and withdraw his approvals.

In July 2010, both Timothy Higgins and Clifford Felstead of SGC and Ralph Brunswick of Templeton Insurance were also banned from working in regulated financial services for their role in the fraud.

FSA director of enforcement and financial crime Margaret Cole says:: “In believing that he could be a ’sleeping director’ without incurring any responsibility, Williams did not take his accountability as an approved person seriously. He recklessly abused the trust and confidence placed in him by leading London market insurers and by doing so enabled secret profits to be made from the fraud by his colleagues.

“The London market relies on the trust and integrity of those who work in it. This sort of breach of fiduciary duty and lack of integrity amounts to very serious misconduct and will not be tolerated in the insurance industry or anywhere else in financial services. We will continue to take action against anybody else tempted to act in this way.”

Recommended

NatWest launches new 90% LTV mortgage

NatWest Intermediary Solutions is launching a new 90 per cent loan-to-value mortgage and is reducing the rates on a number of its other products by up to 0.8 per cent . The 90 per cent LTV deal is available at 6.19 per cent. The lender is also launching a five-year fixed at 60 per cent […]

5

Regulation: What will the next 12 months have in store

2011 promises to be the year that European regulators get more rigorous as well as heralding the beginning of a new era in UK regulation. In the UK, the RDR will continue to take central stage and the Independent Banking Commission’s probe into structural reform is due. At European level, the Committee of European Banking […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Good start to the year for the FSA, £25,000 towards this year’s Xmas party and bonuses! No doubt there is plenty more where this came from.

  2. Don’t tell me it costs the FSA another £17m to prevent £2m fraud.

    In The Times 15.03.05 Mike Adlem, who trained with the fraud squad before embarking on a 15-year career investigating financial crime and advising banks, estimates that the cost of recovering that £46 million was more than £400 million.

    Yes that’s right a cost of 400m to save 46m. Imagine if an IFA showed a set of accounts to the FSA with solvency margins like that!

    IS THE FSA THE SOLUTION OR THE PROBLEM?

Leave a comment