View more on these topics

FSA contests court ruling

The FSA has lodged its appeal against a decision to reject a bid to quash a case brought by a retired IFA who is suing the regulator for harassment.

In August, Money Marketing revealed John Calland is suing the FSA under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, alleging the FSA, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme and the Financial Ombudsman Service worked together to unfairly progress loss assessments and solicit pension complaints from former clients.

The FSA submitted an application to strike out the case but Exeter county court rejected the application.

The regulator has now appealed against the strike-out decision, with a hearing scheduled for next month at Bow county court in east London.

Recommended

S&P downgrades eurozone rescue fund

Rating agency Standard & Poor’s has downgraded the credit rating of the European Financial Stability Facility, the eurozone’s rescue fund, from AAA to AA+. The news follows S&P’s decision to downgrade 9 eurozone members on Friday, including France and Austria. It said therefore the downgrade of the EFSF was inevitable. Also on Friday, S&P confirmed […]

1

Pension reciprocation schemes launch appeal

The trustees of six pension schemes used for pension reciprocation have launched an appeal against the High Court’s ruling that the arrangements are illegal. In June last year, Money Marketing revealed The Pensions Regulator had appointed independent trustee firm Dalriada Trustees to seize control of the bank accounts of the six schemes due to concerns […]

Don’t play chicken with the Bank of Japan

By Josh Ausden, Head of Client Investment Strategy, Neptune Short-term yen strength has hurt the Neptune Japan Opportunities Fund but recent events have only added weight to our conviction that the Bank of Japan will act to ease policy, boosting multinationals’ profits and weakening the yen. In recent weeks the performance of the Japanese stockmarket […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Like many, many other people, I hope sincerely that the FSA’s appeal is roundly rejected.

  2. The FSA simply don’t like being called to account for their disgusting behaviour.

    I really hope moneymarketing and all the professional press make it a priority to give this full coverage if the case gets to court. We want every embarrassing detail to be ventillated in public, so we can all see what a pernicious and mendacious this ‘regulator’ really is.

    They don’t care if they waste money on appealing; it’s not their money and there is a permanent cash-cow lurking nearby that they can milk and milk and milk and the poor cow has no say in the matter.

  3. Mr Calland deserves to have his case heard.

  4. This case will test the principle of the rule of law both criminal and civil.
    Harassment is an offence under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (section 1, 1a)
    I hope the guy wins, but the judiciary in our country cannot be relied on to be fair and reasonable, especially when it involves the FSA, which is immune from prosecution under FSMA

    If this establishes the rights of IFAs to call the FSA to account, it bodes well for anyone who has suffered at the hands of this unaccountable leviathon.

  5. Any update on this Natalie?

Leave a comment