View more on these topics

FSA calls for bill to set out firms’ responsibilities

Senior FSA executives have signalled support for the draft Financial Services Bill to include a principle laying out firms’ responsibilities to consumers.

Currently, the bill contains a clause requiring the Financial Conduct Authority to abide by “the general principle that consumers should take responsibility for their decisions”. There is nothing that lays out the responsibility of firms to consumers.

Last week, FCA chief executive designate Martin Wheatley told the committee scrutinising the bill that having a principle regarding firms’ responsibilities to consumers would be helpful.

But he warned that drafting the principle would be difficult because of the range of financial literacy among those defined as consumers in the bill. The term applies to all consumers, from retail investors to hedge fund managers.

Wheatley said: “If we could articulate that in a way that made sense within the bill, we would be happy if that was part of the process.

“The issue we face is that it is quite a hard thing to define in a legal sense, but to have it as a broad principle within the bill would be helpful to us and we would then have to interpret that within our rules and guidance.”

FSA conduct of business unit interim managing director Margaret Cole said that firms’ responsibilities to consumers are currently laid out in the treating customers fairly principles.

She said: “I do not have a fundamental objection to having something like this in the legislation but in the rules and principles we operate under it is there.”

Wheatley and Cole were responding to a question from and Liberal Democrat MP David Laws who said the responsibilities in the bill are “unbalanced”.

He said: “We seem to have this responsibility principle clearly in the bill saying consumers have got to watch out and take responsibility for what they are purchasing but it is unclear what the responsibility is for firms.”

Recommended

9

FSA rejects concerns that legacy ban will create churn

The FSA has rejected the argument that its ban on legacy commission will lead to the churning of products due to providers’ inability to switch off commission generated on top-ups to existing investments. The regulator published its consultation paper on the treatment of legacy assets under the RDR today. It confirmed that trail commission for […]

IMF warns on build-up of vulnerabilities in Chinese banks

The International Monetary Fund has warned China about a “steady build-up” of vulnerabilities in its financial sector. In its first formal evaluation of the country’s financial sector, the Washington-based lender calls for further reforms to support financial stability and promote balanced growth. Stressing that the sector is essentially healthy, the IMF adds that its current […]

1

‘Avoid blurring restricted and independent advice’

Firms offering both an independent and restricted advice service will need to ensure there is “clear blue water” between the two models, according to regulatory compliance firm Resources Compliance. Speaking at the Personal Finance Society annual conference in Birmingham last week, Resources Compliance consultant David Morgan said: “Firms can offer both independent and restricted advice, […]

DB rules may see SSAS costs increase by 60%

SSAS providers could be forced to link past and future scheme pension payments to the limited price index measure of inflation, potentially increasing costs by 60 per cent. Last month, Money Marketing revealed that a Government amendment to the Pensions Bill has reclassified scheme pension as defined-benefit. The Association of Member-directed Pension Schemes believes DB […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I thought the FSA had already produced absolutely reams of stuff setting out the responsibilities of firms towards their clients? What’s TCF been all about? Does the lily really need gilding any further? Or perhaps I should ask whether or not the existing principles really need yet another layer of gold plating? It just goes on and on and on, ad infinitum.

    Will the FSA ever realise that there are, or at least ought to be, practical limits to the prescriptivity of its 10,000 pages of rules and regulations?

    Oh, how we wish.

  2. While they are at, it perhaps we could have a bill which sets out the FSAs accountability.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com