View more on these topics

FSA bans stockbroker for ‘reckless misconduct’

The FSA has banned managing partner of First Colonial Investments LLP George Leavey for “reckless misconduct”.

The regulator says Leavey was carrying out a significant influence function without FSA approval, failing to oversee the segregation and protection of client money and approving misleading financial promotions. 

FCI was a stock broking firm based in London. The firm’s sales advisers made telephone sales promoting higher risk securities in companies with small cap shares to retail clients. 

Leavey was responsible for the day-to-day running of the stockbroking business and for FCI’s recommendations and sales of shares to clients. However, Leavey failed to register as an approved person, despite carrying out a significant influence role at FCI since its launch in 2006. He also failed to address unsuitable sales practices by FCI’s sales advisers.

FCI received and held client money without having the approvals to do so. The FSA says Leavey, as the managing partner, should have ensured this was segregated from FCI’s own money. He failed to do so, and as a result, at least £883,897 of client money was mixed with the firm’s own asset and was used to pay business expenses at FCI and its unauthorised sister company.

Leavey has referred the matter to the Upper Tribunal.

FSA acting director of enforcement and financial crime Tracey McDermott says: “Being a managing partner of a firm carries substantial responsibility for ensuring that the firm meets its regulatory responsibilities. We believe George Leavey was reckless in his approach to many aspects of the FCI business he was responsible for running.

“The approval of senior managers in authorised firms is a key part of the regulatory framework and a means by which the FSA ensures that authorised firms are properly run and comply with FSA rules. The range of serious regulatory failures in this case shows what can happen when a firm does not have suitable senior managers who are approved by the FSA.”

Recommended

Campaign trail

The challenges to the protection industry are well documented and the most successful businesses are those that come to terms with them and adapt quickly. In the next few months the European football championships, Diamond Jubilee and Olympic Games mean we can create linked marketing messages to specific clients. Linking health and wellbeing reviews for […]

RBS chairman says shareholders will not recoup lost funds

Royal Bank of Scotland chairman Sir Philip Hampton has warned investors who owned the bank prior to its £45.5bn bailout in October 2008 that they were unlikely to recover the money they lost as a result. The Telegraph reports Sir Philip Hampton said investors’ money from the nationalised bank was unlikely to be recouped in […]

BlackRock issues warning on UK consumer stocks

BlackRock UK absolute alpha fund co-manager Nick Osborne has sounded a warning over UK consumer stocks. Speaking to Money Marketing at the Cofunds absolute returns round table last week, Osborne said he is finding short positions in stocks exposed to UK consumers, alongside those companies affected by the eurozone crisis. He said: “We are still […]

BlackRock’s Mark Lyttleton to take 3 month break

BlackRock fund manager Mark Lyttleton is taking a three month break from fund management. Lyttleton (pictured), manager of the £1bn BlackRock UK absolute alpha fund, is to take a break for family reasons from June 18 to September 17. Co-manager Nick Osborne will take sole charge of the UK absolute alpha fund during this period, […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Julian Stevens 28th May 2012 at 4:18 pm

    Since 2006????? So it’s taken the FSA nearly 6 years to apprehend and ban this guy, who appears to have been breaking pretty well every rule in the book applicable to anybody holding a SIF. Would the FSA care to offer any explanation as to just why it took them so long to do anything about it?

  2. Lindsay Bateman 28th May 2012 at 4:22 pm

    “Approving misleading financial promotions”…

    Must be a few other senior individuals who fall into that camp that have escaped retribution so far… “100% principal protected product” etc…

  3. Yet another case of toe rags undermining reputations. Why let him appeal, just send him to jail, directly to jail, conviscate all his assets and pay back the poor saps who fell for this disreputable scam.

Leave a comment