View more on these topics

FSA bans insurance broker and winds up firm

The FSA has banned insurance broker Ambrose Darby director Graham Darby for failings relating to the handling of client money.

The FSA found that Darby, who was diagnosed in July 2008 with a severe medical condition, did not conduct client money reconciliations as required and did not have a full understanding of the firm’s responsibilities regarding the handling of client money.

The FSA also petitioned for the winding up of Ambrose Darby on the basis that Darby, as a result of his illness, was not able to resolve the client money issues at the firm and wind up the company himself in an orderly fashion.

The winding up order was granted on March 10, 2009. It is the first time the FSA has exercised its insolvency powers under Section 367 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 in relation to a regulated small retail firm.

Ambrose Darby is currently in liquidation and is no longer authorised to conduct regulated business.

The FSA found that there were no systems and controls in operation at the firm to manage the receipt of monies from customers or to effect the payment of premiums to insurance providers.

The FSA says it appeared at one time that it owed insurance providers £83,814.71 and was owed £61,961 from customers.

FSA director of enforcement Margaret Cole says: “The FSA is sympathetic with regard to Darby’s medical condition, but the consequence nonetheless was that it was unclear both to customers and providers who was responsible for the day-to-day operation of the firm while he was absent. This was unacceptable.

“Directors must demonstrate their capability to ensure their firm meets compliance standards and those who do not do so face being banned from senior roles in the financial services industry. The case is notable for the first use of our insolvency powers on ‘just and equitable’ grounds with a regulated small retail firm and in similar cases we will not hesitate to use this winding up power to protect consumers and their money.”

Recommended

IMF upgrades Japan forecast

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has upgraded its growth forecast for Japan for 2010 from 0.5% to 1.7%.In its annual assessment, the IMF said it expects Japan’s economy to contract by 6% in 2009 and warned of the need for further measures should the outlook deteriorate.Adjustments in production and the Japanese authorities’ strong fiscal response […]

Alternative medicine

The Investment Management Association is the latest group to shoot down the European Commission’s proposals for regulation of the alternatives’ industry.

OBSR withdraws Aviva Higher Income Plus rating

Old Broad Street Research (OBSR), the ratings agency, has withdrawn the A rating from the Aviva Investors Higher Income Plus fund following news that the manager, Roger Webb, is leaving. It has also removed the £390m fund from its ratings service. Dominic White, who was previously deputy manager on the fund, will now take over […]

Mott goes full circle

Leading fund manager Bill Mott has been reunited once more with the Credit Suisse income range after Premier Asset Management struck a deal to buy 10 funds from Aberdeen Asset Management.

Brexit Commentary from Natixis Global Asset Management

By David F Lafferty, CFA, SVP – Chief Market Strategist Thursday’s historic Leave vote in the UK will have both immediate and long-term consequences for the global economy and financial markets. The initial flight-to-quality reaction across asset classes has been exacerbated by the market’s misplaced confidence in a Remain victory leading up to the vote. Stock markets […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Point and ban
    The banks, Equitable Life et al fell between the regulatory gaps but not a peep out of the regulator, yes they did say “Lessons will be learned” but what evidence is there after over two decades of FSA (nee SIB) tinkering with price (LAUTRO assumed expenses) and choice (Depolarisation now RDR). Were any ‘consumers’ harmed by this diddy little outfit which couldn’t identify who was in control of something? What is the point of all this publicity? Is there nothing really worthwhile for the regulator to publish which proves the £billions it has spent actually achieves anything of substance?

Leave a comment