View more on these topics

Friends&#39 policy is not acceptable

Open letter to Mr D Newbigging, OBE, chairman, Friends Provident As an IFA and Friends Provident policyholder, I am writing to express my disappointment at the way the demutualisation of the company is being used to hide a change in the membership rules which is extending the membership substantially and cannot be in the interests of members.

I am referring to the changes in the rules to extend membership to people who have bought secondhand endowment policies and those whose policies have matured since May 4, 2000 since they have already received benefits based on ownership of a withprofits policy with a mutual life office throughout the term of the policy.

I do not dispute members should be asked whether to include these additional classes of policyholder. However, as a member who has taken the time to read the small print in your 88-page members&#39 circular, I am appalled at the way the vote appears to have been influenced by including the above issues with the vote on whether to demutualise.

Instead of three different issues being put to a separate vote, the whole thing is being presented as “yes” or “no”. Members can vote to receive their free shares if, and only if, they first agree to give away a large quantity of them first.

This “dilution” is described by the “independent” actuary as “acceptable”. I am sure it is acceptable to all those who under the existing rules did not qualify, and must think that Christmas is due in July 2001 but it is not acceptable to me as a member. I will be urging clients of this firm to be aware of the full effect of accepting the reduced share allocation.I would urge all members of Friends Provident to vote against the demutualisation in its current form until Friends Provident can present the vote in a manner which is fair to its existing members.

In particular, I feel that you should find space in an 88-page document to indicate how much of the company is being given away to these new members. My feeling is that the new classes of member are likely to receive considerable numbers of free shares. Matured policies are likely to have much greater benefits than policies with several or more years left to accrue benefits. Secondhand policies are also well advanced and therefore both classes of new members can expect substantial benefits.

Is it coincidence that the timescale of the demutualisation has been brought forward so that these issues can be glossed over and rushed through?

Mike Gordon

Technical manager,

Peter Rutherford & Co Financial Planning Services,

Morpeth, Northumberland


&#39National IFAs first to multi-tie&#39

National IFAs will be first to become multi-tied if the proposed changes to polarisation are implemented, according to Misys IFA Services managing director Patrick Gale. Speaking at the annual conference of Misys network Countrywide last week, Gale predicted that national IFAs will be first to set up multitie salesforces because they are likely to be […]

Grand float for Friends aims to bring in £1.4bn

Friends Provident is planning a £4.2bn flotation on the stockmarket in July, giving qualifying members share windfalls potentially worth £1,000. The float is expected to raise around £1.4bn of capital, giving the life office a market value of £3.7bn to £4.2bn. All 1.7 million members will qualify for a single fixed allocation of 200 shares […]

Test series

As I began to explain last week, the new Enterprise Management Incentives scheme is designed to be a flexible share option scheme with few administrative requirements. Unlike with other share option schemes, the Inland Revenue does not intend to publish any model scheme rules. The original limit on the number of employees participating in an […]

Woolwich admin under strain as applications flood in for Open Plan

The Woolwich&#39s mortgage administration department is understood to be close to collapse after being flooded with applications for its Open Plan product range. Industry sources claim the UK&#39s fourth-biggest lender is buckling under the strain of coping with rocketing applications from IFAs since the bank revamped its flexible mortgage range in January. IFAs claim that […]

Sticking to valuation discipline when investing in China

Journalist Alexis Xydias discusses the opportunities – and potential pitfalls – of investing in China with Artemis fund manager Peter Saacke. With Peter holding significant positions in China in the Artemis funds he manages, journalist Alexis Xydias quizzes Peter on the risks of investing in Chinese stocks – including over-valuations, margin trading and financial reporting issues. Click here for video


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and thought leadership.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm