View more on these topics

Friends Life to compensate for unsuitable DB transfer advice

The Financial Ombudsman Service has ruled against Friends Life for giving unsuitable advice on a pension transfer from a defined benefit scheme.

In the ruling Mr S complains the advice he received from Friends Life to move pension benefits from his former employer’s final salary scheme to a personal pension arrangement was not suitable.

In April 2000 Mr S was advised to transfer to the personal pension on the basis that it was likely to provide greater benefits than his former employer’s scheme.

The transfer value analysis provided to Mr S at the time showed that the rate of return required to match Mr S’s existing pension benefits was around 7.5 per cent.

Therefore, to match the benefits Mr S was giving up, his pension pot would need to grow at approximately 7.5 per cent each year.

Based on the information available, it does not appear that Mr S’s attitude to investment risk was recorded at the time the advice was given.

It appears Mr S’s family was financially dependent on him and there is nothing to suggest he was an experienced investor.

In 2016, Mr S complained to Friends Life as he did not think the advice he had received was suitable.

Friends Life did not uphold Mr S’s complaint and said the growth rate, of around 7.5 per cent per year, needed to match the benefits from Mr S’s scheme would have been considered achievable at the time the advice was given.

Mr S was not satisfied with Friends Life’s response and brought his complaint to the FOS where the adjudicator thought the complaint should be upheld.

The adjudicator said the rate of growth needed to match the benefits Mr S would have been entitled to from his former employer’s pension scheme was a high-risk strategy.

Furthermore there was no evidence to show Mr S was willing to take such a risk.

Friends Life confirmed it had received the adjudicator’s view but did not say whether it accepted it and so the complaint was passed on to ombudsman Suzannah Stuart.

Stuart agreed with the adjudicator and upheld the complaint for similar reasons.

She notes the transfer value analysis carried out at the time showed that the rate of return required to match Mr S’s existing pension benefits was around 7.5 per cent.

However, Stuart argues a growth rate at least 1 per cent higher than 7.5 per cent was needed to make it worthwhile for Mr S to take the risk associated with transferring.

On this basis, Mr S’s personal pension would have needed to achieve a growth rate in the region of 8.5 per cent per year to provide sufficient benefit for the risk of the transfer.

The suitability report does not describe Mr S’s attitude to investment risk, so it is not possible to say with any certainty how much risk he wanted to take with this pension pot.

Stuart says based on fact-find information she does not think Mr S was in a position to take a high level of investment risk in the hope of beating the benefits he would have been entitled from his former employer’s scheme.

While Stuart accepts it may not have been unreasonable in 2000 to anticipate growth rates of around 8.5 per cent she adds Friends Life should have realised the investments needed to generate this return would be too risky for Mr S.

Therefore, she concludes the advice Mr S received was not suitable and the investment risk associated with the transfer was too great for Mr S’s personal and financial circumstances.

She orders Friends Life to compensate Mr S based on the FCA’s updated guidance on unsuitable DB transfers from an occupational scheme to a personal pension.

Stuart adds the compensation in respect of any future loss should if possible be paid into Mr S’s pension plan, allow for the effect of charges and any available tax relief.

An Aviva spokeswoman says: “We’re unable to comment on the details of this specific case but will abide by the ombudsman’s decision.”

Aviva acquired Friends Life in 2014.

Recommended

Calculating Savings
1

Regulator writes to 12 pension schemes over DB transfers

The Pensions Regulator has written to trustees of 12 defined benefit pension schemes this year about pension transfer activity. According to a Freedom of Information Act request published on its website, TPR says the communication included a joint letter from the FCA, TPR and The Pension Advisory Service for members requesting transfer values advising them […]

technical financial graph on technology abstract background

Pension transfers hit record £10.6bn in Q1

Pension transfers hit a record of £10.6bn in the first quarter of this year, according to Office for National Statistics data. The figures show the value of pension transfers in 2017 was revised up £2.5bn to £36.8bn. AJ Bell senior analyst Tom Selby says: “The Q1 2018 figure also likely includes a large number of […]

File image of a pension savings pot
3

DB transfers reach 100,000 a year

Around 100,000 people transferred out of their defined benefit pension between 1 April 2017 and 31 March 2018, according to data from The Pensions Regulator. A Freedom of Information Act request published on TPR’s website says DB schemes have reported around 72,700 transfers out during that period. The total value of those transfers was £14.3bn. […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. John Hutton-Attenborough 14th August 2018 at 2:42 pm

    Base rate in 2000 was 5.75% and 15 year GILT was 5.27%. Cash funds would have been paying it bit more. What was considered a high risk return in 2000 in the heat of the TTM bubble?

    • ……the whole issue with these types of complaints (from over 18 years ago) are that the guidance (and rules) at the time were very different from today and as John says – with a 15 year Gilt Rate of 5.27% pa – a 50:50 equity portfolio should have hit the 7.50% pa required. Bet the client has done some other things as well – and has run out of money! I see FOS has added a 1.00% pa additional return required…..but why??

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com