View more on these topics

FOS reopens 13 ‘final’ decisions in 5 years

The Financial Ombudsman Service has reopened 13 complaints following a final ombudsman’s decision in the past five years, Money Marketing can reveal.

The FOS caused controversy in September when it reviewed a final decision upheld against Sipp operator Berkeley Burke for failing to carry out adequate due diligence on an unregulated collective investment scheme.

The FOS said Berkeley Burke had started the judicial review process, and as a result it was considering the complaint afresh. It has yet to make a decision on the case.

In response to a series of FoI requests submitted by Highclere Financial Services partner Alan Lakey, the FOS says since January 2010 it has reopened 13 cases following an ombudsman decision.

Of these, six resulted in a change in decision, all in favour of the business.

The FOS says in one case, a claimant had begun legal action and the ombudsman had been ordered by the court to pay £8,000 towards their costs. The payment was not made, however, as the decision was reversed in favour of the firm.

In its FoI response, the FOS says: “On the rare occasion that we reconsider an ombudsman’s decision the general reason for doing so is because further information comes to light.

“Of course another reason why the FOS makes such a decision is because it wishes to avoid the costs of unnecessary litigation.”

But a FOS spokeswoman says this has been “poorly worded”.

She says: “The only reason the FOS would look at a case again after an ombudsman decision is because new information has come to light.”

The FoIs also show the FOS made payments totalling £495,954 between January 2010 and October 2014 to complainants as compensation for poor service.

The payments relate to 2,264 complaints, on issues such as failure to adhere to procedures and timeliness. 

Lakey says: “This raises a lot of questions about the way the FOS operates, and it needs to give more clarity.”



Attivo acquires Reading-based advice firm for undisclosed sum

Wealth management firm Attivo has acquired Reading-based advice firm Sanderson Financial Consultancy for an undisclosed sum. Sanderson has 190 active clients, £16m in funds under management and recurring income of over £130,000 a year. Attivo chief executive Stephen Harper says the firm is targeting 12 acquisitions in 2015. He says: “The acquisition of Sanderson is […]


Adviser jailed for stealing £1m from clients

A financial adviser who admitted stealing almost £1m from his clients has been jailed for four years and eight months. The Eastbourne Herald reports John Field of Meads Financial Consultants was sentenced at Lewes Crown Court last week. He has been banned from setting up a company for eight years. He pleaded guilty to a […]


Chris Hannant: The long-stop debate starts now

We have had a couple of false dawns with regards to the FCA’s review of the need for a long-stop but later this month Apfa members will finally be meeting the regulator to start the conversation. Apfa submitted its case for a long-stop in writing last week. The arguments about the impact of unlimited liability […]

Jonathan Lipkin Peach 250x255

Jonathan Lipkin: How the industry is working to boost charges disclosure

Today, the Investment Association publishes a position paper that sets out our contribution to date on how charge and transaction cost disclosure could work across any long-term investment product, including DC pension accounts.  In 2012, we started by backing the use of the ongoing charges figure (OCF) to disclose charges deducted from a fund on […]


Lifetime Isa – how it works

According to George Osborne “people like Isas – because they’re simple”. Fiona Tait is not convinced… Contributions & bonuses What he said: “From April 2017, anyone under the age of 40 will be able to open a Lifetime Isa and save up to £4,000 each year. And for every £4 you save, the Government will […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Incompetent Regulators 12th February 2015 at 10:21 am

    I’m sure if the FOS had a proper independent audit, there would plenty of other reversed decisions!

  2. It might be argued that if either party failed to produce all the evidence relevant to its case before a final decision was handed down, then tough. The other side of that coin is that either party should have the right to challenge what might be argued has been a miscarriage of justice. Tricky.

  3. How many adjudications were reversed?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm