View more on these topics

FOS accused of ignoring adviser evidence in rulings

The Financial Ombudsman Service is failing to take adviser evidence into account in around a third of cases, according to Apfa research.

Responding to a survey carried out by the trade body, 34 per cent of advisers that have had a complaint referred to the FOS said the ruling did not take their evidence into account.

Some 8 per cent of advisers also reported the reasoning for a ruling was not always provided while around one in five said a complaint against them had been referred to the FOS in the last three years.

Of the complaints that were ref-erred to the FOS, 47 per cent said most cases were found in their fav-our while 26 per cent said most were found in the complainant’s favour.

Some 8 per cent said they had had an equal number of each outcome and 18 per cent either did not know or the case was still being investigated. 

Apfa director general Chris Hannant says: “While it is positive to see that only a small number of advisers have had complaints referred to the FOS, it is worrying advisers feel the Ombudsman does not value the evidence they provide.

“This issue may only be affecting a small number of advisers but it is nonetheless an important one. Adv-isers put a lot of time and effort into responding to complaints and presenting evidence to the FOS and the ombudsman should take this into account when ruling on cases. In addition, if advisers do not understand the reasoning behind the FOS’s decision, they cannot do anything to ensure similar issues do not arise in the future.

“If the FOS is disregarding advisers’ evidence, it needs to provide a valid reason for doing so, otherwise it must clearly demonstrate that the evidence has been considered and explain the reasons behind all its
decisions. 

“We will continue to monitor the situation and keep this issue in front of the ombudsman.”

A FOS spokesman says: “In every case we investigate, we consider the evidence provided by both parties before reaching a decision of what we think is fair and reasonable in the circumstances.”

The survey was conducted among 216 advisers in April.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Julian Stevens 5th June 2014 at 9:22 am

    APFA’s research indicates that the Financial Ombudsman Service is failing to take adviser evidence into account in around a third of cases.

    The FOS refutes this by claiming that In every case it investigates, its adjudicators consider the evidence provided by both parties before reaching a decision as to what they think is fair and reasonable in the circumstances.

    Now what?

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com