View more on these topics

Former Libor traders launch complaint against FCA

FCA logo glass 620x430

Two former UBS Libor traders have brought complaints against the FCA to the Complaints Commissioner over claims the regulator did not comply with its disclosure obligations.

An Upper Tribunal decision made last week relating to a case involving former UBS GBP rates desk head Arif Hussein refers to an ongoing complaint against the FCA.

According to the decision, the incident centres on whether material the FCA received for a US regulator would have triggered a three-year limitation period under the Financial Services and Markets Act for the FCA to bring proceedings.

The decision says: “Enforcement confirmed to Mr Hussein’s solicitors that they decided not to pursue the s66 case because of concerns as to whether material received for the CFTC, the relevant US regulator, may have triggered the commencement of the three-year limitation period prescribed by s66 earlier than had hitherto been thought to be the case.

“The authority acknowledged that the change in its position at this stage in the proceedings was unsatisfactory and accepted that it did not give adequate consideration to the potential impact of the contents of the documents received for the CFTC in their analysis of the limitation period. The Authority apologised for this but denied any bad faith on its part.”

Hussein also claims the regulator did not disclose information relating to a conversation with a manager where he raised concerns about the activities of traders at UBS.

The decision says: “Mr Hussein and Mr Koutsogiannis have complained to the Complaints Commissioner with respect to the authority’s conduct of their cases, the complaint centring around allegations of a failure on the part of the authority to comply with its disclosure obligations regarding the limitation period and (in the case of Mr Hussein) his conversation with Mr Leeming. Accordingly, Mr Hussein has no confidence that the authority has complied with its disclosure obligations.”

In April, the FCA sought to ban Hussein from any role in regulated financial services for allowing the bank’s trader submitters to make Libor submissions with the aim of benefiting UBS’s trading positions.

The tribunal decision was determining whether parts of Hussein’s case should be struck out and whether the FCA should be directed to disclose further documents. There will be a full hearing next year.

In the decision, Judge Timothy Herrington refused a disclosure request for some documents around the FCA’s decision and said Hussein must narrow his case.



Traders ‘competed to win the Libor cup’

The High Court has heard how bankers from Lloyds Banking Group and Royal Bank of Scotland competed against each other to earn the title “Libor legend”. The Sunday Times reports the claims have been made as part of a court case against RBS by the developer Property Alliance Group, which is claiming it was missold […]


Ex-Barclays staff jailed over Libor rigging

Three Barclays employees who were this week found guilty of Libor rigging have been sentenced to a total of 17 years in jail. Libor submitter Jonathan Mathew was handed a four-year sentence while Libor traders Jay Merchant and Alex Pabon were sentenced to six and a half years and two years and nine months, respectively. […]


SFO seeks retrial of ex-Barclays Libor traders

The Serious Fraud Office is seeking a retrial of two former Barclays Libor traders, whose previous trial came to an end last week. Traders Ryan Reich and Stelios Contogoulas were trialled previously, but a jury failed to reach a decision, following two weeks of deliberation. At the same trial three former employees of Barclays were found […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Victim of dodgy claims 19th December 2016 at 2:03 pm

    The complaints commissioner is a joke. Of in the unlikely event of the CC agreeing with any complaint against the FCA, we all pick up the tab. It’s about time individuals were personally held to account at the FCA, FOS and FSCS.

    • I agree, currently they have NO skin in the game. Their legal protection is diametrically opposed to their own research as identified in op 16-24. Crown immunity for HM forces went out decades ago, to be replaced by F-pack immunity. You can cripple a country via money or supply of basic goods/foodstuff and even the ability to germinate with GM and the rulers can do it with impunity via this system whilst soldiers are held to account personally.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm