The Government’s Funding for Lending scheme is seemingly faltering after figures published today by the Bank of England show net lending has fallen since the scheme’s launch in August.
The figures show participating lenders have drawn down £13.8bn from the scheme since August, £9.5bn of which occurred in the fourth quarter of 2012. However, net lending showed a deficit of £2.4bn in the fourth quarter, despite the number of participants rising from 35 to 39 over the same period.
The scheme was designed to provide lenders with cheap funds as long as they maintain or increase their net lending. However, since the scheme’s launch, there has been a £1.5bn deficit in net lending, as at the end of December.
Figures from the Bank of England show net lending by FLS participants rose £0.9bn over the two months following the launch of the scheme but this gain has been completely wiped out by the overall contraction in lending of £1.5bn.
Virgin Money and Nationwide have recorded the highest levels of cumulative net lending since the launch of the scheme. Virgin Money loaned £1.1bn against the £0.5bn drawn down while Nationwide loaned £3.6bn against a drawdown of £2bn.
Barclays has the highest level of net cumulative lending since August, totalling £5.7bn, but it has drawn down £6bn, a net fall of £300m. It is also the highest drawdown figure of any other participant.
Net cumulative lending at Royal Bank of Scotland has decreased by £2.3bn, while it has drawn down £0.8bn.
Santander and Lloyds Banking Group recorded a fall in net lending of £6.3bn and £5.6bn over the same period of time, despite drawing down £1bn and £3bn respectively.
Bank of England director for the markets Paul Fishers says: “The FLS has clearly shifted the supply of credit: loans are generally available at lower cost than previously. Even though lending rates have fallen, it is still quite early for much extra money to have flowed from the application stage into actual loans, compared with previous plans which showed that lending was most likely to fall in aggregate without the FLS.
“I would not expect to see a return to rising aggregate quantities until we start getting data for 2013 at the earliest. Nevertheless, it does seem that we have the beginnings of a revival in mortgage activity which is visible in the approvals data and that trend is widely supported by business contacts throughout the country.”
Capital Economics UK economist Martin Beck says: “There is still this issue of whether the demand for loans is still there. It is all very well to make it cheaper for households to borrow money but if they do not want to then the FLS is unlikely to have the impact the Bank is hoping for. We are in an economy where households are heavily indebted and looking to reduce this burden. Firms are equally reluctant to borrow because consumer demand is so weak.
“You might expect the state-owned banks to be doing a bit more to stimulate lending. The figures for RBS are particularly disappointing given you would expect them to feel more compulsion to do more since they are partly owned by the Government.”
The table below shows how much participating lenders have drawn down and their net lending levels since August: