I was pleased to see that my letter, Trusts are the perfect solution, generated such interesting debate on the Money Marketing Letters to the Editor page.A Letter to the Editor obviously cannot cover the many intricate complexities of inheritance tax planning. However, I felt that it was worth responding to the letters from Julian Stevens and Gerry Brown. They both essentially pick up on the assertion that trusts cannot be easily broken. Perhaps I was imprecise in my choice of words and wound up, distributed or otherwise varied would be more appropriate. However, the point that I was making was that one of the possible advantages of a gift to a trust as part of an estate planning exercise (for example, a discretionary trust) over an absolute gift, is that it can retain flexibility for the trustees/settlor. It may defer any decisions over the application of capital and income and better protects the trust’s capital from calamities such as divorce, profligacy or silliness. As far as getting the agreement of all the beneficiaries to bring the trust to an end, this is not usually necessary.Subject to the terms of the trust deed, it is often the trustees’ decision and theirs alone. There are, of course, wider issues about the manage-ment of the trust, including investment of the trust funds, tax issues, etc. My letter was not written with the intention of getting drawn into these sort of arguments, merely to point out that trusts are extremely flexible and underused vehicles. I cannot, however, agree more with the final paragraph of Gerry Brown’s letter that the solution is dependent on the needs of each individual client. Peter Legg Head of inheritance tax planning matters, Vantis Tax, London
Over the past month, the great industry debate has been retention. Most of the lending industry would love to do without intermediaries.
Those Lanson girls really are eager. Ex-Money Marketing hack now at the Daily Mail James Coney got a pleasant call from a Lansonette with a press release which she described as being “really relevant at the moment”. Was it on the subject of the party political conferences taking place over the next few weeks, the […]
Treating Customers Fairly – is it a catchphrase or a reality with providers? IFAs have no choice but to treat customers fairly if we want any sort of long-term relationship. The client has to believe we are treating them fairly and operating in their best interests. But I do not get the same feeling from providers over whether they care about long-term relationships with their customers and certainly it looks as if some pay lip-service to treating customers fairly while in reality doing nothing of the sort.
Lifesearch has lashed out at Paymentcare, claiming it is mislabelling ASU and MPPI as income protection. The firm says many general insurance firms are not following FSA treating customers fairly principles because they are promoting ASU and MPPI products as income protection. Paymentcare has been pinpointed as one of many prov-iders which Lifesearch says may […]
Join Jelf at Employee Benefits Live 2015 for a personal demo of how benefits technology can help you.
- Top trends
News and expert analysis straight to your inboxSign up
Latest from Money Marketing
JLM Mortgage Services has launched the first stage of its new ‘robo advice’ service. The mortgage and protection network claims it is the first network to launch such a tool to its members. The Virtual Adviser will allow member brokers to offer an online service to residential and buy-to-let customers. This service will offer an […]
Providers should listen closer to advisers and consumers when deciding what initiatives will work
Continuing this series looking at how firms make their investment decisions, we speak to Tenet Group technical services and research manager Joanne Rigby