View more on these topics

When to consider first death residence nil rate band planning

Many couples transfer the nil rate band to be used on second death but this may not always be the best planning

Although it seems as if it has been with us forever, the residence nil rate band is only in its first year of operation. Every time I have to consider the provisions underpinning it, I am reminded of how amazingly complex they are.

This is especially so given the relatively simple objective set out by the Conservatives under David Cameron. Simply put, “No family with an estate of less than £1m should have to pay inheritance tax”. Or words to that effect. Not too difficult, one would think.

But then the legislation began to be put together and, because the additional relief was to be focused on the main residence rather than a simple increase to the nil rate band, complexity inevitably flowed… and flowed… and flowed.

We now have limitations, downsizing provisions, qualifying definitions and much more to consider. I am sure none of this was envisaged at the time of the initial aspiration.

One of the less expected provisions for the residence nil rate band is that it will be “cut back” by £1 for every £2 the estate of the deceased exceeds £2m. It is worth noting that, in arriving at the value of one’s estate for this purpose, you ignore business property relief and agricultural property relief and do not add in lifetime gifts made in the seven years immediately before death. In effect, a plain English meaning of estate is taken, unchanged by provisions affecting the inheritance tax liability introduced by legislation.

And let’s also not forget any unused residence nil rate band from the death of the first of a couple to die is transferable to the survivor in much the same way the “ordinary” nil rate band is.

Since the ordinary transferable nil rate band rules came into force in 2007, many married couples have chosen not to make use of the nil rate band on first death. Many believe this is because it is available for transfer so it can be used on second death, subject to a claim being made by the personal representatives within two years of that death.

Nevertheless, for those with more complicated family affairs, use of the ordinary nil rate band is still made on first death, often through the use of a discretionary nil rate trust.

With the introduction of a residence nil rate band, is there a further argument to make use of the nil rate band on the first death? As with all cases, client circumstances would need to be fully considered.

Here I provide an overview of where clients may wish to consider first death nil rate band planning.

1. To make use of a previously deceased spouse’s nil rate band

If a widow/er remarries having inherited everything from their first spouse, they may wish to draft their own will to make use of their nil rate band plus that of the previous spouse. If they die first leaving all assets to their new spouse, they will have lost the ability to claim their deceased spouse’s unused nil rate band and possibly unused RNRB.

Modern day relationships and families come in all shapes and sizes. Some may require the certainty assets are left to particular people; for example, children or grandchildren from a previous marriage.

2. To hold a high growth value asset

If assets have a high growth potential (for example, land with planning permission), it may be better placing them into trust on the first death to prevent increasing the estate of a surviving spouse for IHT purposes. In effect, this will be a bet that the asset(s) in question will increase in value at a greater rate than the nil rate band, which would be increased by the unused nil rate band.

3. To preserve business property/agricultural property relief

If all assets are left to a surviving spouse on the first death, the availability of business property relief and/or agricultural property relief could be wasted, as the assets will pass exempt to the surviving spouse in any event. In these cases, it may be worth executing the will to pass such assets into trust or in favour of a particular (non-exempt) beneficiary to prevent losing out on the relief.

4. To keep the estate of the survivor under the residence nil rate band taper threshold

This is the benefit most being talked about these days. Where the estate of the second of a couple to die would be in excess of the £2m taper threshold, the amount of the RNRB (possibly including that left from the first to die) available to the survivor will be restricted by £1 for every £2 exceeding it, even if the estate of the first to die was less than this amount.

So, for example, if on first death the estate is worth £2.2m, the residence nil rate band will be reduced by £100,000. If, however, the will of the first to die was drafted to leave the nil rate band of £325,000 into trust, the total estate on first death would be £1,875,000, which would not be affected by the taper threshold.

These are just a few points to be aware of when advising clients. Of course, it will all depend on overall objectives and circumstances. As always, wills should be reviewed regularly to ensure they reflect the wishes of the testator and take account of estate planning best practice.

Tony Wickenden is joint managing director of Technical Connection. You can find him Tweeting @tecconn



Advice firm to compensate over tax issue

An advice firm must pay compensation following a complaint from a client who said he was “wrongly” advised to encash some investment bonds without having regard to the likely tax implications. According to a Financial Ombudsman Service decision, the firm, Prism Financial Advice, did not explain to the client that, as a higher rate taxpayer, […]

AFH Alan Hudson 700

AFH buys Colchester advice firm for £2m

Consolidator AFH has acquired Colchester-based advice firm Britton Financial. The deal is AFH’s first for the current financial year. It completed 13 deals in the previous financial year. A stock exchange announcement says the maximum purchase price is just over £2m. For the 12 months ended 31 May 2017 Britton reported profit before tax of […]


Gina Miller-led manager launches new Sipp as it reforms fees

SCM Direct has tweaked the fees on its digital offering in response to the upcoming Mifid II rules as it launches a new Sipp account. The company, headed by prominent anti-Brexit campaigner Gina Miller and her husband Alan, claims the changes to the platform will make it one of the cheapest digital wealth managers in […]

Guide cover

Guide: how to… communicate with your pension members

Effective communication of your pension scheme is a large part of getting auto-enrolment right. Delivering the same message to all employees is not necessarily the way to go. To assist you with the communication of your pension scheme, we have provided some key areas to think about, such as:

  • What to consider when segmenting your workforce
  • How to communicate to pension scheme members at the right time in their member lifecycle
  • What topics you should be discussing with your pension members
  • The new pension freedoms and the importance of communicating them


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. “…if on first death the estate is worth £2.2m, the RNRB will be reduced by £100,000. If, however, the will of the first to die was drafted to leave the nil rate band of £325,000 into trust, the total estate on first death would be £1,875,000, which would not be affected by the taper threshold.”

    Are you sure, Tony? The legacy to the trust still forms part of the death estate, does it not? If so, tapering surely still applies, and £100,000 being both the RNRB this year and the amount tapered, 0% of the deceased’s RNRB can be inherited by the surviving spouse/civil partner.

Leave a comment