View more on these topics

Firm investigated by FCA over handling of PPI complaints

The FCA is investigating one firm over “serious problems” in the way it dealt with payment protection insurance misselling complaints and says it is considering whether several other firms should face further action.

The regulator has carried out a review into how 18 small and medium-sized firms are handling PPI complaints, covering smaller high street banks, building societies and credit card and personal loan companies.

It found “serious problems” with complaints handling in 12 out of the 18 firms reviewed.

The FCA asked each firm to provide a sample of 50 PPI complaints, made up of 40 rejected complaints and 10 upheld. 

Complaint cases were judged on whether complaint handlers were assessing the merits of individual complaints in line with FCA rules and guidance, whether offers of redress were fair, and whether complaint handlers explained their decisions clearly to consumers.

In 12 of the firms reviewed, accounting for 6 per cent of all PPI complaints, the FCA disagreed with six out of 10 rejected cases and had concerns with the redress offers in almost half of the upheld cases.

To date, firms have paid out almost £12bn over missold PPI.

FCA director of supervision Clive Adamson says: “PPI has developed into the biggest issue of financial misselling in recent years, and has significantly damaged public trust in financial institutions. Ensuring that firms put things right by handling PPI complaints fairly is vital to bringing closure to the issue and rebuilding public confidence, and is a priority for the FCA.”

Highclere Financial Services partner Alan Lakey says: “I am dumbstruck that firms are still getting it wrong on handling PPI complaints. It is not as if there been a lack of guidance on how firms should be assessing complaints.”



Govt moves closer to criminal sanctions for ‘reckless’ bankers

The Government has moved closer to introducing criminal sanctions for “reckless” bankers as part of reforms to overhaul the banking system. A total of 86 amendments has been published on the banking reform bill ahead of scrutiny of the bill in the House of Lords next week. The banking reform bill largely adopts a raft […]


Regulation, regulation, regulation

brightcove.createExperiences(); CHAIR – Sam Shaw – Journalist and Presenter Nick Ross – Principal Consultant at Huntswood Nick Bamford – Executive Director at Informed Choice Graham Bentley – MD at gbi2 James Robson – Independent Financial Planner at Plutus Wealth Sponsored by Huntswood


Govt offers armed forces interest-free loans towards mortgage deposit

The Government is to offer interest-free loans to help armed forces personnel raise a deposit to buy a home. The BBC reports defence secretary Philip Hammond has announced that from 1 April 2014, servicemen and women will be offered an interest-free loan for up to 50 per cent of their salary and capped at a […]


FCA takes almost 6 months to authorise new firms

New financial services firms are having to wait an average of almost six months before gaining authorisation from the FCA, figures from law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain reveal. Firms had to wait 25.8 weeks between April and June for FCA approval, up 6 per cent from the 24.3 week wait experienced by firms in the […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Given that one of the FSA’s primary responsibilities is to protect and enhance the reputation of the FS industry, the question that remains unanswered is why the mis-selling of these products was allowed to reach such epidemic proportions before action was embarked upon to address it. If ever there was an example of shutting the stable door long after the horses have bolted, this is surely it. The FSA was obviously looking at other things of what many people consider to be considerably less urgency, typically the minutiae of what small, low risk IFA’s do and how they do it. And now, as usual, no one at Canary Wharf will be called or held to account. It was just another of those collective failures of governance behind which the individuals responsible remain comfortably shielded.

    It’s that same old rotten chestnut ~ lack of accountability.

  2. The FCA shouldn’t be just CONSIDERING action, they should be TAKING action.

    What about those who had claims but were unfairly rejected? Are those cases going to be ropened? We are talking millions of pounds of PEOPLES MONEY.

    We feel something needs to be done about it.
    Follow on twitter: @ppigroupaction

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm