View more on these topics

Financial services firms bemoan regulatory costs


The new Conservative Government should focus on cutting the cost of regulatory compliance, financial services firms say.

According to the latest quarterly CBI and PwC financial services survey, tax stability was the second most popular concern among the industry, especially for general insurers and investment managers.

Banks, investment banks and other companies, including life insurers, also blamed regulation for falling productivity, the survey shows.

Particularly, increasing competition, at 75 per cent, and statutory legislation and regulation, at 67 per cent, were the factors cited as most likely to limit their business expansion over the next year.

CBI director of economics Rain Newton-Smith says: “Demand for financial services continues to strengthen, with profits holding up and employment showing signs of an improving trend.

“But the cost of regulation and tax uncertainty are a top concern for firms across the sector. They want to see the government focus on keeping the UK a competitive financial centre by not putting UK firms at a disadvantage.”

The survey also found that business volumes are set to grow at a slightly faster pace over the next quarter, with profits predicted to increase in most sectors apart from banking.

PwC UK financial services head Kevin Burrowes says: “Levels of optimism amongst banks remains broadly unchanged this quarter which is a little surprising as we had expected to see a bounce from the election result and the greater encouragement for financial services from the new Government.

“However, ongoing regulatory uncertainty, the EU referendum and other macro-economic factors have dampened the outlook at least in the short term.”


Fidelity: When will central banks tighten monetary policy?

As we move into the second half of 2015, central banks’ policy stance will be front-of-mind for investors. Loose monetary policy has supported global growth since the financial crisis but, as recovery becomes more entrenched, central banks are finally looking to exit this period of extraordinary accommodation and start tightening policy over the next few […]


Legg Mason merges Martin Currie funds into UK range

Legg Mason has merged eight Martin Currie equity funds into its UK fund range following shareholder approval. The asset manager, which acquired Martin Currie in October last year, now has 18 funds in its ICVC fund range and an additional £500m in assets. The Martin Currie funds will retain their branding but will be prefixed […]


Platforum: Retirement income trends from across the pond

The UK at-retirement market is in the midst of massive change. This is news to no one. But it is not just the pension freedoms that are changing our market. The retirement market sits at the epicentre of a perfect storm of change driven by regulators, technological shifts, competitor dynamics and changing consumer preference. Financial […]


Labour: 45p tax rate cut would be ‘crass and unjust’

Shadow chancellor Chris Leslie has warned any reductions in taxes for the richest would represent “gross irresponsibility and unfairness”. Speaking earlier today at KPMG, the Labour MP warned Chancellor George Osborne against slashing the top rate of tax from 45p to 40p ahead of the 8 July Budget. He said: “George Osborne has form when […]

Cricket - thumbnail

England vs Australia: pensions

Well, the cricket season is here, and England and Australia are stepping up to the wicket. Although we compete with each other in the sporting world, when it comes to pensions, Australia’s pension programme is held up as a model for our auto-enrolment initiative. Auto-enrolment was introduced because people weren’t saving enough into their pensions, and it is still early days but signs are positive. However, in Australia, saving into a pension is compulsory, and in fact employers are the ones who have to pay in. Employees in Australia can make additional contributions into their pensions, but they don’t have to. Should the onus be on the employer or employee to save? Well in the UK we think it’s both, but to get ‘adequate’ savings for retirement it’s the employee who has to pay more in.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Julian Stevens 30th June 2015 at 5:20 pm

    No good complaining to the regulators themselves. They don’t care and don’t listen (and certainly not to APFA).

    Better to get behind Libertatem in the hope of a concerted campaign to force the FCA to conform to the requirements of the Statutory Code of Practice for Regulators. Read it here Unenforced, as it presently is, it’s nothing but window dressing. Enforced, it could actually make a difference.

Leave a comment