View more on these topics

Final straw as the FSA makes pension U-turn

The FSA is waking up to the fact that final-salary schemes are not the safe haven they were and has made an about-turn on its pension policy.

The combined effects of pension fund accounting standard FRS17, increased longevity and poor equity returns have prompted a steady flow of closures of defined-benefit schemes by employers, changing the pension transfer environment.

The extent of the problem was highlighted this month when a report from actuaries Watson Wyatt estimated a deficit of £70bn across UK final-salary schemes.

The pension review was based on the theory that transferring out of an employer&#39s final-salary scheme to a personal pension was almost always wrong.

But now many employees are losing their final-salary schemes. Last week saw the second one-day strike by steelworkers at the Caparo steelworks, owned by Labour peer Lord Paul, over the plan to switch existing employees from a final-salary scheme to a defined-contribution stakeholder plan.

Scottish Equitable director (pensions development) Stewart Ritchie says: “There are those who say there is no such thing as a defined-benefit scheme in this country. That may be going a bit far but it is true to say that a final-salary scheme is only as good as the company standing behind it.”

“People approaching retirement age whose final-salary schemes are closing are finding that a lot of what they thought they would get will not in fact come to them.”

Over 1,000 employees of Big Food Group, formerly Iceland, are consulting lawyers about the threat to their defined-contribution scheme.

The situation is complicated by the ranking of priority in the winding up of a scheme. The minimum funding requirement is a weak test and on wind-up can leave those who are not retired with next to nothing after those who have already retired, who rank higher in priority, have had their benefits secured.

The FSA&#39s website carries a guide to the risks of pension transfers, in which final-salary schemes are repeatedly referred to as carrying guarantees, but now it says that consumers and advisers need to be wary of final-salary schemes.

Informed Choice director Nick Bamford says: “There is an implication from the FSA pension transfer rules that if you are in a defined-benefit scheme then you have secured benefits. We need a reappraisal of the security of defined-benefit schemes.”

The FSA has accepted that the landscape has changed but says it will not alter its documentation.

Spokeswoman Louise Buckley says: “Retrospectively, we would have said that final-salary schemes were much better than defined-contribution schemes. In the old days, final-salary schemes were better than money purchase.

“That situation has now changed. Firms are pulling out of final-salary schemes and there are shortfalls. You have to weigh these things up and take market considerations into account. But we have no plans to change the rules on pension transfers.”

This seems like a major shift in the FSA&#39s view and has left some IFAs wondering if compensation paid to people who came out of final-salary schemes that have since been wound up is too high and needs to be looked at again.

Carrington Consultants director Mike Hodges says: “To me, this is a big U-turn by the FSA. In the past, they have said personal pensions are only appropriate in very rare circumstances.”

Syndaxi Financial Planning principal Robert Reid says: “For the FSA to say that personal pension schemes can be better than final-salary schemes is a U-turn. A lot of the old FSA notes on the subject said final-salary schemes are the best thing since sliced bread. They should adapt their consumer leaflets to reflect the changing situation.”

The change in the FSA&#39s viewpoint underlines the difficulties that IFAs have in advising on pension transfers. The FSA will not give any guidance on how to deal with pension transfers other than telling IFAs to consider all circumstances, including the strength of the final-salary scheme.

Unfortunately for IFAs, they do not have access to all the data required to make a full assessment of the quality of a final-salary scheme.

Reid says: “You need to assess the final-salary scheme&#39s strength but you are not entitled to all the information that is necessary to make that assessment.”

It leaves IFAs in a dilemma which the FSA is not going to help to solve.

Richard Jacobs Pension & Trustee Services director Richard Jacobs says: “The FSA will not give us any guidance but will put me out of business if I give the wrong guidance.”

Recommended

Benefit without reservation

The Inland Revenue (Capital Taxes) has recently been looking closely at many of the inheritance tax planning arrangements that IFAs are promoting, including those using the “spouse alienation trust”. Indeed, a case involving this approach to inheritance tax planning has just been heard in the High Court. What is a “spouse alienation trust”? This arrangement […]

Birmingham Midshires offers tracker Isa

Birmingham Midshires is offering a capital protected Isa that is linked to the FTSE 100 index over a five-year term.The Birmingham Midshires 5-year tracker guaranteed investment Isa (issue 8) is available as a mini cash Isa and as a Tessa only Isa. It offers investors the return of their original capital after five years, whatever […]

FSA asks if hedge fund rules should be eased

Hedge funds may soon be marketed direct to retail investors after an FSA consultation paper asking the industry to comment on plans to make them more accessible. The paper, Hedge Funds and the FSA, asks the industry for feedback on whether it should be easier to invest in hedge funds to reflect the expansion in […]

Matrix set for two hedge Fofs

Venture capital trust specialist Matrix Money Management is to launch two funds of hedge funds as part of its bid to become a one-stop shop for long/short investments. The Citadel market-neutral fund of hedge funds will be offered next month to IFAs. It aims to generate after-charge annual returns of 8-10 per cent with a […]

Retirement fund - thumbnail

What price (more) freedoms?

George Osborne will make his last Budget speech of the current parliamentary term this week, and the early media briefings suggest that pensions will again feature heavily in that statement. So what are we able to learn from the weekend’s coverage?

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com