View more on these topics

FCA wins appeal over £100k fine against ex-B&B finance director

Book-and-Gavel-Justice-Fine-Ban-700x450.jpg

The Financial Conduct Authority has won a High Court appeal in its bid to fine former Bradford & Bingley group finance director Christopher Willford £100,000 for failing to verify the bank’s results ahead of a rights issue.

The case centres around the handling of Bradford & Bingley’s proposed rights issue in May 2008.

In June 2008 the board was forced to issue an updated trading statement which amounted to a profit warning, and despite the rights issue being restructured the capital raising was ultimately unsuccessful. B&B was nationalised in September 2008 with its savings business and branch network sold to Santander.

A decision notice was issued against Willford in October 2010 by the Regulatory Decisions Committee, part of the regulator’s independent appeals process.

The RDC said it had decided to fine Willford £100,000 for failing to ensure the finance department checked B&B’s financial results in light of the rights issue, and that he failed to realise there had been a material change in the bank’s trading position.

The decision notice also found that Willford had failed to realise that bad mortgage debts had increased to a level that could seriously impact on the bank’s profits.

Willford challenged the decision notice via a judicial review, arguing the reasons given by the RDC for the £100,000 fine were inadequate.

He originally won that judicial review, but the FCA has now won an appeal to reinstate its decision notice.

In his judgment on the appeal, published yesterday, Lord Justice Moore-Bick say: “What is in issue is the degree into which the reasons needed to go in this case in order to meet the statutory requirements. I do not think it was necessary in this case for the RDC to respond in detail to every point made by Mr Willford, provided it gave sufficient reasons to enable him to understand the basis of its decision. For those reasons I would allow the appeal.”

Willford can now either choose to fight the decision through the Supreme Court or the Upper Tribunal, or accept the decision notice.

Recommended

8

Ex-HBOS chief James Crosby stripped of knighthood

Former HBOS chief executive James Crosby has been formally stripped of his knighthood following a damning report into the bank’s collapse. Crosby was HBOS chief executive from its creation in 2001 following the merger of Halifax and Bank of Scotland to 2006. He was also FSA deputy chairman from 2007 to 2009. Crosby said he […]

The Technical Quiz: 13 June

To help you to keep up with the fundamentals of tax, retirement and financial planning, try answering these questions. Answers below.

4

Think tank calls for savings-based unemployment welfare

A think tank has called on the Government to implement a new system of unemployment support based on compulsory savings backed up by guarantees from friends and family.  The Social Market Foundation says the system would require all citizens to open a “lifecycle account” into which they would save a compulsory percentage of their monthly […]

2

George Osborne wants Lloyds sell-off by 2015

Chancellor George Osborne will use his Mansion House speech this week to signal he is keen for Lloyds Banking Group to return to private ownership by the 2015 general election. The Financial Times reports that according to aides, Osborne will not lay out a specific timetable for a sell-off of the Government’s stakes in either […]

Jelf flexible benefits

In Focus: How to choose a flexible benefits provider — seven top tips

Jelf Employee Benefits looks at some of the key considerations employers should think about when reviewing and choosing a flexible benefits provider. Choosing the right benefits for your employees is one thing but delivering a successful employee benefits strategy is about understanding the complete picture and delivering it in a personalised way so that it resonates with each and every individual in your business. 

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Won largely on a legal technicality but a good decision nonetheless.

    However, it’s interesting that one of the judges took a swipe at the RDC:

    “I agree that the appeal should be allowed but would expect a clearer and more focused approach by RDCs. It is the quality of the reasoning rather than its length that is important.”

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com