View more on these topics

FCA to cut RMAR questions and move to annual reporting

The FCA has proposed further changes to the retail mediation activities return, including moving to an annual reporting structure for section K, after trade bodies branded changes made in November inadequate.

In a consultation published today, the regulator is proposing moving to an annual rather than six-monthly reporting structure for section K and allowing firms to complete section K on either a cash or accruals accounting basis. The rest of the RMAR would still need to be reported every six months.

The FCA is proposing removing section L, which relates to consultancy charging. It says these changes to sections K and L will halve the annual reporting cost to advisers from £2.6m to £1.3m.  

It is also proposing bringing its annual questionnaire completed by authorised professional firms into GABRIEL, its online reporting system, and reducing the number of questions by 75 per cent. 

Since 30 June, advisers have had to complete new sections K and L when completing RMAR returns, which requires firms to send the FCA additional information on initial and ongoing advice charges, whether advice is independent or restricted, and how advice is paid for.

Money Marketing revealed in September adviser trade and professional bodies were pushing for an urgent review of the RMAR after firms raised repeated concerns over the amount of work involved.

In November the FCA issued a technical note on section K of the RMAR and admitted it had failed to provide firms with enough support on completing the returns.

But trade bodies said while the additional guidance was welcome, a full review and more significant changes – including a move to an annual reporting structure – were still needed.

In the consultation paper, the FCA says it published the technical note in order to provide “immediate” clarification on how firms should complete section K, but it recognises that “broader concerns” remain around the data it is seeking to collect. 

It says the proposed changes will make the data obligations on firms “proportionate”. 

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Very welcomed !!!

    Just makes so much sense, especially for a very small firm like mine

  2. Both I and the APFA Council have been in discussion with the FCA regarding this.

    This is a clear indication that the ‘new regulator’ is prepared to listen.

    It is also an indication that APFA can make a difference by imparting logic and commonsense.

  3. Good news to see that they are acting true to their word on this, nice one! The biggest problem with being a rule-maker is that it becomes self-perpetuating and to draw back from this is a good sign.

  4. Sounds good to me – well done APFA and thank you the new FCA. To be honest I never had that much trouble with the returns after the initial two, but I confess I get very tense at the time.

    I will now have to revamp my accountancy package which automatically produced the required stats from the management accounts another big job for no pay (Ain’t XL wonderful!).

Leave a comment