View more on these topics

FCA slammed over six-month complaint handling delay

Hourglass-Deadline-Time-Clock-700.jpgThe FCA has come under criticism from the Complaints Commissioner after it took six months to respond to a complaint and failed to properly explain how it had improved its systems.

The complaint centred around comments by the FCA’s mortgage sector manager at a panel debate in September 2015 which were then reported in the Daily Mail under the headline, “It’s time to sell up your home OAPs told”.

The manager’s comments included: “We’ve got a real issue about the last time buyer… older borrowers who basically pay off their mortgage and sit quite happily in a very big house… does there need to be thought given to try and encourage older consumers to actually move away, build appropriate housing for retired people in the right places? There is a big debate to be had about whether the Government’s focus is actually in the right place.”

The complainant complained to the regulator the day after the conference saying the FCA was not focusing on the “real issues” affecting pensioners and called for the mortgage manager’s dismissal.

The FCA did not issue its response to the complaint until 24 March 2016. It upheld the complaint saying that the situation that led to the manager’s comments should have been better handled and that there had been a “lack of care” by the regulator.

The complainant remained dissatisfied with the FCA’s response so referred the complaint to the Complaints Commissioner.

Commissioner Antony Townsend says the FCA did properly investigate the issues raised in the complaint however, he adds: “It would have been helpful if the FCA’s response had provided you with more information about the improvements identified by its internal review. This might have reassured you that the FCA had taken seriously the event and its repercussions, even if it did not consider it could share more detailed content with you.”

Townsend says the FCA took “far too long” to deal with the complaint.

He says: “There was no good reason why the response to your complaint was so badly delayed. This has been further exacerbated by delays in the FCA’s response to the additional questions I raised during my investigation, taking 16 working days to respond and failing to react to at least one reminder.”

Townsend did not agree that there had been a “cover up” by the FCA of a “serious failure on behalf of a senior member of staff”, as the complainant alleged.

Townsend says: “The evidence I have seen does not support the conclusion that there was a lack of briefing provided to the staff member.”

He adds: “However, I accept that as a result of your complaint the FCA has identified the need to have more formal guidance in place to clarify its expectations of employees who attend public events. I welcome this.”

Townsend recommended the FCA pay the complainant £150 for distress and inconvenience caused by the delay in the complaint being handled.

Recommended

FCA logo glass 3 620x430
2

Complaints Commissioner: ‘FCA should be less defensive’

The Complaints Commissioner has criticised the FCA for adopting a defensive attitude when handling complaints and for failing to admit its shortcomings in “awkward” cases. The Complaints Commisioner reviews complaints against the FCA, the FSA, the Bank of England and the Prudential Regulation Authority after firms have been through the relevant regulator’s own complaints process. […]

FCA-FSA-Skywards-700x450.jpg
14

Complaints commissioner finds ‘serious failings’ in FCA enforcement case

The complaints commissioner has ordered the FCA to apologise to a firm and pay it £1,000 in compensation, after finding “serious” failings in the way an enforcement investigation was carried out. The firm complained about the manner in which the regulator undertook an unannounced enforcement visit to its offices in April 2009, as well as […]

5

Complaints Commissioner warns over FCA early warning powers

Complaints Commissioner Sir Anthony Holland has raised significant concerns about proposed new regulatory powers which would allow publication of ongoing enforcement actions. Holland warned MPs scrutinising the draft Financial Services Bill last week that Government plans to allow the Financial Conduct Authority to publicise warning notices against firms and individuals and the grounds on which […]

Japan: the Land of the Rising Dividends

By George Boyd-Bowman, Fund Manager at Neptune Many Western investors have long bemoaned the lack of a true dividend culture in Japan, claiming the corporate culture is not tilted in favour of shareholders. Yet today, in the Land of the Rising Sun, we see a fresh impetus to focus on shareholder returns, which is leading […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. £150 of OPM. So what (as far as the FCA is concerned)?

    • I couldn’t agree more. It should come out of senior manager’s bonus pool as they get paid such big ones. If if comes off general running costs, then that is paid for by us AND by the complainent.

Leave a comment