View more on these topics

FCA sets out proposals for handling interest-only borrowers


The FCA says mortgage lenders will be required to set out their plans for dealing with the estimated 48 per cent of interest-only borrowers unable to fully repay their loans.

In a consultation on interest-only borrowing which launched this week, the FCA says it expects lenders to understand what repayment vehicles their borrowers have in place, as well as the size of any potential short­fall. Where a shortfall is identified, lenders will be required to alert borrowers “in sufficient time” for them to take action.

The FCA is proposing making lenders set out in writing how they will deal with interest-only borrowers with a shortfall who are coming to the end of their loan. Offering alternative options will not be mandatory but it has suggested lenders explain why certain options are or are not available.

FCA chief executive Martin Wheatley says: “Lenders, regulators and borrowers need to ensure that they grasp the nettle now before it is too late.”

Last year, Wheatley described interest-only mortgages as a “ticking timebomb” and new research from the FCA, also published this week, shows the size of the problem. The FCA predicts that of  2.6 million interest-only mortgages due for repayment over the next 30 years, 10 per cent – 260,000 – do not have a repayment vehicle in place.

Its review of consumer awareness suggests 37 per cent of interest-only borrowers believe they will be unable to fully repay their loans. However, the FCA says it believes this underestimates the problem and the real figure will be around 48 per cent. It places the average shortfall at £71,850 over the next 30 years.

London & Country associate director of communications David Hollingworth says: “ What consumers cannot do is just sit back and do nothing.”




Letter to the editor: FCA in a spin over financial crisis

I was much intrigued by the letters relating to disclosure in the Money Marketing edition of 18 April. The intrigue was triggered by an article by Tim Harford in the FT Magazine, 20 April, outlining a research project undertaken by the FCA, highlighting the benefit of clear and brief correspondence. To suggest that the regulator is […]

Cofunds’ Stephen Mohan quits

Cofunds managing director of operational services Stephen Mohan has quit after more than seven years with the firm. Mohan, who has been with Cofunds since October 2005, has accepted another role within the industry although it has not yet been disclosed. Cofunds says Mohan will leave the business later this year but will stay in the […]


Letter to the editor: Long-running court battle continues

Money Marketing readers may recall my long-running fight against the FSA, which I am suing under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 because the FSA, FSCS and FOS worked together to unfairly progress loss assessments and solicit pension complaints from former clients. The FSA has twice applied for the case to be dismissed, despite a […]

FCA fines private bank £4.2.m for anti-money laundering failures

The Financial Conduct Authority has fined EFG Private Bank £4.2m for serious failures in its anti-money laundering controls. EFG is the UK private banking subsidiary of Switzerland-based global private banking group EFGI Group. It provides private banking and wealth management services to high-net-worth individuals, including some from overseas jurisdictions recognised as presenting a higher risk […]

Guide front cover - thumbnail

Guide: how to… audit your auto-enrolment scheme compliance

As the Pensions Regulator starts to bare its teeth and the changes mentioned in the Budget and Queen’s Speech start to come into force, it is essential that you understand your scheme and the processes you need to undertake to ensure it remains compliant. Our second re-enrolment guide looks at how to audit the key areas of your auto-enrolment scheme.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 3 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. People take out interest only mortgages knowing they should make sure they can pay off the capital at the end.

    Why should the state and tax payers pick up the bill when it goes pear-shaped?

  2. RegulatorSaurusRex 2nd May 2013 at 9:48 am

    We the regulators can’t see why consumers should have interest only mortgages instead of paying rent.

    We need to go to Specsavers.

  3. The shortfall would be less with an endowment.

    The only reason people took on interest only mortgages was because it was all they could afford, they could not afford to pay back they capital, yet more pressure on the looming propely price crash.

    Not long to go now.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm