View more on these topics

FCA raises adviser fees by 10%

Advisers’ FCA fees will increase by 10.2 per cent next year, to account for higher staff and technology costs at the regulator.

In a paper on proposed fees and levies published today, the FCA says A13 advisers will pay £74.9m in 2015/16, up from £68m in 2014/15.

The A13 fee block relates to advisers who do not hold client money.

The regulator is also increasing its minimum fee from £1,000 to £1,084, the first rise since 2010. It says 38 per cent of firms will pay the minimum fee.

The FCA announced in its business plan earlier this week that its annual funding requirement will increase by 8 per cent, from £446.4m in 2014/15 to £481.6m in 2015/16.

It says the increase is driven by a £16m rise in staff costs due to higher headcount, and an £11m rise in costs relating to technology, upgrading information systems and a new learning and development suite, the FCA Academy.

The regulator is recovering the increase across all of its fee blocks, but A13 advisers are seeing the highest increase.

The FCA says this is because it adjusted fees for this block by £1.1m in 2014/15, as it had over-recovered RDR change costs the previous year.



MPs to accuse FCA of ‘dereliction of duty’ over botched briefing

The FCA is set to be condemned by MPs over its handling of a briefing which sparked fears of a regulatory clampdown and sent share prices plummeting. According to Sky News, the Treasury Select Committee is to slam the FCA’s handling of an inquiry into closed-book insurers in March. Chairman John Griffith-Jones and chief executive […]


Unwilling advisers threaten Govt tradeable annuites plan

Advisers’ reluctance to help pensioners sell their annuities risks undermining the Government’s plans to create a second-hand market in 2016. A Money Marketing online poll of 365 advisers reveals 80 per cent would not want to be involved with advising on the merits of selling on an annuity in exchange for cash or moving into drawdown. […]


Steve Webb demands end to pension tax relief tinkering

Pensions minister Steve Webb has called on ministers to cease tinkering with levels of tax-free pension savings – weeks after the Coalition announced a further cut to the lifetime allowance. Osborne announced the limit for tax-free lifetime pensions savings would be cut from £1.25m to £1m in last week’s Budget, effective from April 2016. It is […]


Canada Life launches pension freedom products

Canada Life is set to launch three new products designed to give savers full access to their pensions following the introduction of the pension freedoms on 6 April. The provider is offering a new personal pension, called the Pension Investment Plan, aimed at consolidating existing pensions that may not offer full flexibility to customers. Members […]

Natixis video: Making smarter use of asset classes

Content supplied by Natixis Global Asset Management This video from Natixis Global Asset Management focuses on Active Share. One strategy for the smarter use of equity investments is ensuring you get what you pay for. According to the company, looking at Active Share can give you a better perspective on where performance comes from. Active […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 15 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Here we go again instead of cost cutting by one moving from Canary Wharf to more realistic offices just hike the fees. Be interesting to see where the board meetings are held, how much the bonuses increase and how top brass expenses add up

  2. I’m convinced the FCA will only be happy when there are no advisers left. They’ll concentrate on providers and banks and we’ll be consigned to the annul of history. They can’t keep going back to the well this way as it’s getting beyond a joke. Less advisers than at any point in history but the FCA needs more staff. This can’t be real, and why are there not serious questions being asked at government level about how this organisation is being run?

  3. Surely the ‘TSC’ need to call FCA to account, albeit it a toothless outcome!

  4. Yet another example (as if any were needed) that the FCA should (and, in any properly democratic society, surely would) be subject to the imprimatur of a Statutory Independent Regulatory Oversight Committee to yank the reins on increases such as this. When if Parliament going to wake up to this and do something about it? Because it has absolutely no powers other than to ask questions, the TSC is a waste of space. One can imagine Andrew Tyrie suggesting to Martin Wheatley that this increase really is excessive, particularly in view of all the other financial drubbings to which the intermediary sector is constantly subjected and that the FCA ought to reconsider. What would Martin Wheatley’s response be? Yeah, well, it’s already done and announced now so we’re not going to revisit it and, if you don’t like that, you can go……

  5. Just taken this from the FCA Website. My employer can`t offer these sort of benefits, and I would warrant that there are NO financial services firms out these who could. This tends to explain why they have such a rapacious appetite for our money.

    Work with us and you’ll receive a range of benefits on top of a competitive salary. That’s because we value our staff – their hard work, expertise and commitment.

    We offer:
    •up to 38 days’ holiday (our flexible benefits scheme lets you add to your core allowance up to this amount).
    The core allowances are: ?Administrators and Associates: 25 days
    ?Manager and Technical Specialist: 28 days
    ?Head of Department and Director: 30 days

    •a competitive non-contributory pension scheme
    •an employee assistance programme
    •a health screening
    •an annual incentive bonus scheme
    •an interest-free season ticket loan of up to £7,500
    •the opportunity to apply for sponsored study

    Protection for your future includes:
    •life assurance
    •private medical insurance
    •permanent health insurance
    •occupational sick pay

    We’ve also got a flexible benefits allowance that lets you:
    •extend your health and private medical insurance to cover your family
    •opt for dental cover
    •opt for childcare vouchers
    •opt for travel insurance
    •top up other benefits, including your holidays and pension

    If you don’t want to buy extra benefits with your allowance, you can have it added to your salary instead.

  6. @. I think the FCA are moving to the Olympic Park.

    I don’t object to paying for regulation, however it would seem to me that a 10% increase would need some degree of significant justification. Given that inflation is now 0% and all advisers are qualified to a reasonable level, all are charging fees, autoenrolment is on the way and the FCA is taking the approach of “pro-active” regulation of specific issues, it seems somewhat more reasonable that the cost of regulation should actually be falling, not rising. There are many good things that the regulator does, but doing its sums on costs of doing the job well enough is not one of them.

  7. What ever happened to the approx. £118 million these muppets overcharged us??? We should all refuse to pay our fees until they remedy this theft.

  8. Simply because they can do what they like and they do just that…….and charge what they like… If you don’t like the fees.. then get out the business…The single most autocratic entity this side of an African dictatorship…

  9. and it will get worse… even if their costs remain the same – yeah some hope – there will be significantly less advisers to spread the load post March 2016.

  10. In case you haven’t realised, the FSA/FCA had an unwritten objective to shrink the advice community to a handful of large players which could be monitored and dictated to with ease.

    …..almost there!

  11. Given that their core objectives have been reduced by the split into FCA & PRA one would be forgiven for thinking that fees should have reduced.

    Of course, if the humongous fines weren’t dished out to the Treasury, which gave some to the armed forces and kept 90% for other purposes, then we’d actually have around a 30% reduction.

  12. Arrogance; pure unadulterated arrogance. The FCA knows it can “deal” with any IFA company/firm/partnership that gets anywhere near to a successful challenge to its overarching authority.

  13. @ wingco

    But maybe not a well funded trade association with some spunk

  14. Garry (11.14)

    A counter irritant IS needed but, as you quite rightly say, a more dynamic trade association would be a great asset

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm