View more on these topics

FCA mulls exit fee ban for platform switches

The FCA is considering banning exit fees for switching platforms.

In its platform market study, released this morning, the FCA says it may also issue further guidance on how advisers should charge for platform switches after finding that the process and the costs involved can often be lengthy, preventing clients from getting the best deal available.

The regulator finds switching times vary from weeks to months, adding an additional burden for financial planners, and exit fees – which are charged by half of the largest platforms – are rarely understood by consumers.

The FCA writes: “Many advisers told us that they charge additional advice fees for switching platform because it is a full advice event which requires them to produce a suitability report. We recognise advisers need to be fairly paid for their work. But it is not clear to us why meeting suitability requirements to switch platforms should outweigh the benefits of switching platform.”

Even though receiving platforms can sometimes cover exit fees, they can lead to additional switching delays, the regulator notes.

The FCA says: “Advisers update their platform lists for new investments over time, but not many advisers switch existing investments as the process is complicated. This means that even if there are better options, which advisers use for new clients, they rarely switch existing investments across platforms. Many advisers in our sample charge an extra fee for switching on top of their ongoing advice fee, which can cancel out the potential benefit of lower platform fees and act as an additional barrier.”

The FCA will look to target the platforms themselves, with measures aimed at “improving switching between share classes, for example by requiring the ceding platform to switch consumers to the receiving platform’s share class before a switch takes place”.

It will also conduct further work with the Transfers and Re-registration Industry Group set up by the sector in 2016.



FSCS declares more advice firms in default

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme has declared eight firms in default in June, at least half of which are financial advisers. Firms included on the list are Professional Financial Advisers of Cheltenham, Yorkshire-based ICF Group and Scottish business Fergus Burns, which was formerly called The Financial Planning Partnership. Also on the list is West-Midlands business […]

Delivering advice and guidance in the workplace

Three advisers share their ideas and experiences of helping employees with their financial decisions The workplace is instrumental in engaging people to save for retirement. How are advisers helping employers provide advice or guidance to their employees? Telephone guidance Financial education provider and advice firm Wealth at Work recently launched a telephone guidance service to […]

Pension-Pensions-savings-retirement-piggy bank

Pension scam losses jump 70%

The delay on the ban of pensions cold-calling until the Autumn will continue to compound fraud problems in the pensions space, AJ Bell says. The platform has responded to figures from City of London Police who say pensions are the common target for the increased number of investment fraudsters this tax year. A total of £51m has […]

A DGT with 100% access and 100% discount?

Clare Moffat, Technical Manager, looks at the benefits of pensions from an IHT perspective. 100% access and 100% discount – what type of wrapper could this be? A pension! Post flexibility there is 100% access (for those over 55) and normally pensions are inheritance tax (IHT) free. With flexibility the options available on death mean […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Will any ban imposed by the FCA extend to Hargreaves Lansdown’s practice of charging exit fees off its platform (£25 per holding and £25 for complete closure of the account)? Somewhere amongst its multitude of COBS rules is one that prohibits this, so why does the FCA allow HL allow to ignore it?

  2. “But it is not clear to us why meeting suitability requirements to switch platforms should outweigh the benefits of switching platform.” = positive noises.

    Having said that, isn’t this another example of costs being re-bundled?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm