If a Sipp firm cannot meet its financial commitments it may be in the interest to customers for all or part of its business to be sold to another firm, the FCA has said today in a Dear CEO letter to Sipp operators.
The regulator claims that operators must communicate “in an open and cooperative way” in its response to the ongoing High Court claims against Sipp providers Berkeley Burke and Carey Pensions.
“Pending the outcome of any appeal of today’s judgment and these other cases, we expect you to consider the potential implications of them for your firm and its customers. We will be contacting Sipp operators to discuss what these may be.
“If the outcome of any of these cases calls into question your firm’s ability both now and in the future to meet its financial commitments as they fall due, you must notify the FCA immediately. Where relevant, firms should also notify claims to their professional indemnity insurers in accordance with their policies.”
The letter adds: “We recognise that if a firm may not be able to meet its financial commitments, it may be in the interests of some of its customers for part or all of its business to be sold to another firm. If your firm does so, we remind you that our Principles for Businesses require your firm to pay due regard to its customers’ interests and treat them fairly. In particular, in pursuing any sale, your firm should pay due regard to its implications for customers who may have compensation claims.”
“We expect all Directors, as well as complying with the relevant provisions of the FCA Handbook, to comply with their statutory and non-statutory duties. These include, where a firm is at risk of insolvency, their duties to creditors, such as customers to whom compensation is or may be due.”
Responding to the letter, an Association of Member-directed Pension Schemes spokesperson said: “It is clearly positive that there is no implication that Sipp providers need to give advice to their members or that they should be checking that the investment is suitable for the particular member. Knowing the client and what is suitable for them clearly falls to the adviser, if there is one. However, the ruling does make it clear that it is for the Sipp provider to ensure that the investment itself is suitable for the pension scheme.
“The majority of Sipp providers take the due diligence of investments incredibly seriously but care needs to be taken because as we can see from this ruling it is difficult to establish if what has been done is going to be sufficient. Each case will need to be assessed on its merits but we don’t feel that this ruling is a game changer for the majority of our members.
“With regards to the Dear CEO letter, Sipp providers should be well capitalised due to the changes in the capital adequacy requirements brought in during September 2016 and should have measures in place to remain compliant.”
Elsewhere, Dentons director of technical services Martin Tilley told Money Marketing: “The FCA’s letters to provider CEOs suggests it expects the ruling may have wider implications for the whole Sipp market as well. Sipp providers should now be assessing how this outcome may impact their own book and their customers.”