View more on these topics

FCA gives firms in due diligence review clean bill of health

Past business review addresses due diligence failings, but regulator fails to revisit firms asked to clean up processes

The FCA has completed its assessment of firms from its thematic review of due diligence last year, saying it has not needed to take further action against those with which it identified issues.

In February last year, the FCA assessed how firms went about conducting research and due diligence on products and services such as platforms.

Of the 13 advisers it reviewed, it said it would ask three to sign an “attestation” – in which they agreed to rectify issues – and one to undergo a past business review after finding that some firms had been placing convenience above client service in their platform choice.

The regulator also expressed concern over whether centralised investment propositions were ensuring advice was suitable for each client.

Responding to a Freedom of Information request from Money Marketing, the FCA confirmed that, while all three firms that were asked to sign an attestation had done so, it had not revisited them to verify they had made changes to their processes.

The regulator said: “We asked all three firms to undertake and confirm (attest) to the completion of a series of actions to address the specific areas of concern identified. The FCA did not conduct any further visits to the firms involved in order to ensure compliance with the attestations. However, we may test compliance during the course of our supervisory work in the future.”

The FCA added that the past business review had not uncovered consumer detriment but had addressed the issues it raised.

It said: “We had concerns that the due diligence approach adopted by a firm in our sample may have led to consumer detriment and requested that the firm undertake a past business review to determine whether detriment had occurred; to address any detriment identified and to take steps to improve the due diligence approach going forward. The results from the past business review addressed the FCA’s concerns fully. No consumer detriment was identified.”

Recommended

2

Five DFMs target adviser due diligence in new taskforce

Five UK discretionary fund management firms have joined forces to educate advisers on DFMs due diligence. The DFM Alliance, which will start free continuing professional development conferences in June across the UK, is made of representatives from Brewin Dolphin, Brooks Macdonald, Investec Wealth & Investment, Quilter Cheviot and Rathbones. The firms collectively manage over £130bn […]

FCA logo glass 2 620x430
4

FCA abandons seven investigations due to ‘lack of evidence’

The FCA has abandoned seven investigations into individuals since 1 January 2015 because of a lack of evidence, Money Marketing can reveal. Money Marketing filed a Freedom of Information request after it was revealed in August the regulator ceased its investigation into Lloyds Banking Group head of gilts trading Tony Gray because there was no […]

Can UK companies satisfy global appetites?

By Mark Martin, Manager of Neptune UK Mid Cap Fund

Rapid economic and income growth is leading to a dramatic shift in diet towards protein products right around the globe. UK companies such as Genus, the world’s largest livestock breeder, are benefiting from this increasing demand. Mark Martin, manager of the Neptune UK Mid Cap Fund, discusses this investment theme.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Julian Stevens 3rd May 2017 at 3:03 pm

    Um, did this D review encompass UCIS which, I think we can all agree, are where the real problems lie?

  2. Ha Ha Ha “The FCA did not conduct any further visits……” I know of at least one IFA that puts 99% of Clients into the same DFM undre an agreement whereby they will get a bonus after 3 years or so. HA HA HA you couldn’t make it up

Leave a comment