View more on these topics

FCA fines State Street UK £23m

The FCA has fined State Street UK £22.9m for charging clients substantial mark-ups on changes to asset portfolios without agreeing these charges with clients.

The regulator says the firm’s transitions management business developed and executed a deliberate strategy to charge clients substantial mark-ups on certain transitions, in addition to the agreed management fee or commission. These mark-ups had not been agreed by the clients and were concealed from them.

TM is a service provided to clients to support structural changes to asset portfolios with the intention of managing risk and increasing returns.

TM services may be required when a client needs a large portfolio of securities to be restructured, or when a client decides to remove or replace asset managers.

Between June 2010 and September 2011 the FCA found that State Street UK’s TM business deliberately overcharged six clients a total of $20.2m (£12.3m).

State Street UK’s clients include large investment management firms and pension funds holding the funds and savings of retail investors.

The overcharging accounted for over a quarter of TM’s revenue.

FCA director of enforcement and financial crime Tracey McDermott says the firm acted “with complete disregard for the interests of its customers”.

She says: “State Street UK allowed a culture to develop in the UK TM business which prioritised revenue generation over the interests of its customers.

“State Street UK’s significant failings in culture and controls allowed deliberate overcharging to take place and to continue undetected.

“Their conduct has fallen far short of our expectations. Firms should be in no doubt that the spotlight will remain on wholesale conduct.”

The FCA says the systemic weaknesses in State Street UK’s business practices and control environment around the UK TM business were so serious that the overcharging only came to light after a client notified staff that it had identified mark-ups on certain trades that had not been agreed.

Those responsible then incorrectly claimed both to the client and later to State Street UK’s compliance department the charging was an inadvertent error, and arranged for a substantial rebate to be paid on that false basis. They deliberately failed to disclose the existence of further mark-ups on other trades conducted as part of the same transition.

The FCA says State Street UK failed to treat its customers fairly, failed to communicate with clients in a way that was clear, fair and not misleading, and failed to take reasonable care to organise and control its affairs responsibly, with adequate risk systems.

Once senior management became aware of the issue State Street UK took action to investigate the misconduct and to implement a comprehensive programme to improve the UK TM business controls and bolster control functions, governance and culture across its UK businesses.

State Street UK agreed to settle at an early stage of the FCA’s investigation and has therefore qualified for a 30 per cent discount. Were it not for this discount, the FCA would have imposed a fine of £32.7m.

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Ok to fine the company – and quite right too.

    Now what about the individuals concerned?

  2. Well if ever the Regulator decides to fine me I do hope it will be in proportion.

    State Street has a market cap of $30 billion. It has £188 billion under management in the UK. If it only earns 0.1% that’s £188million. On this figure the fine represents 12.2% and I’ll bet they make a darn site more than 0.1%. Moreover this is only in the UK. In the US they are the second oldest financial institution with mind boggling amounts under management.

    Moreover as Smithy has already pointed out when the likes of us are fined it comes straight out of our pocket. In this case no doubt the shareholders pay.
    Oh and I wonder how many of their customers actually complained?
    Level playing field? Wassat?

Leave a comment