View more on these topics

FCA considers charge cap in payday loans clampdown

The FCA is considering capping charges on payday loans as part of a wide-ranging clampdown on the sector.

The FCA has today set out how it plans to regulate consumer credit firms from April 2014, when it will take on responsibility for more than 50,000 firms who have existing credit licences.

The regulator has proposed capping the number of times a payday lender can rollover loans to two in order to protect consumers from high charges.

In addition, the FCA wants to limit the number of times a payday lender can take money from a customer’s bank account using a continuous payment authority to two.

The regulator stopped short of capping prices on payday loans at this stage but will revisit the idea after it has taken over regulation of the sector.

The FCA says: “We considered whether it would be appropriate to introduce a limit on how much interest firms can charge on a loan – so how much it costs a customer to have credit. However, at this stage we don’t believe we have enough evidence or information to fully understand the implications of doing this.

“From April 2014, we will have the power to gather information from consumer credit firms and we will work closely with the other competition authorities to develop comprehensive evidence so we can consider whether structural changes, like price capping or setting maximum loan amounts, are necessary to ensure a competitive market that delivers better outcomes for consumers.

“We remain concerned at the treatment of customers in financial difficulty, particularly in relation to fees and charges. We will consider carrying out a thematic review of market practice in this area once firms have transferred to the FCA.”

FCA chief executive Martin Wheatley says: “We believe that payday lending has a place; many people make use of these loans and pay off their debt without a hitch, so we don’t want to stop that happening. 

“But this type of credit must only be offered to those that can afford it and payday lenders must not be allowed to drain money from a borrower’s account. 

“That is why we’re imposing tighter affordability checks, and limiting the use of rollovers and continuous payment authorities.

“Today I’m putting payday lenders on notice: tougher regulation is coming and I expect them all to make changes so that consumers get a fair outcome. The clock is ticking.”



Govt to unveil new code of conduct for landlords

Private renters will be able to demand rental agreements of up to five years as part of a new code of conduct for landlords, reports The Times. Communities Secretary Eric Pickles will today unveil a “tenants’ charter” designed to put pressure on landlords to provide renters with greater security. At present most contracts between landlords and […]


John Porteous to lead Baker Tilly wealth management arm

Baker Tilly has named John Porteous as head of wealth management following the firm’s acquisition of RSM Tenon. Porteous was previously head of wealth management at RSM Tenon, which went into administration in August.  Baker Tilly bought the firm from the administrators the same morning after pulling out of a deal to acquire RSM Tenon […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Let us not focus on pay day lenders but on the rest of the paper which frankly makes depressing reading. More compliance, control functions, designated individuals, reporting and so forth. OFT butted in once every 5 years. Now it appears that it will be more often and more intrusive.
    Then there is no indication of how much this will cost us. For many IFAs who do not do mortgages a CCL is required because we must advise (or at least be in a position to advise) on debt and loans where our clients have these but this is only to cover our backsides since in practice this is only occasionally done.
    One thing is clear, the FCA are getting more involved and jacking up further our costs….

  2. I listened to the interview with Mr Wheatley on the 7.00 news, in which they also interviewed someone who had taken such loans.

    I found it all very instructive and for me it amply illustrated all that is wrong with regulation.

    The gentleman chosen as the subject was quite evidently a complete idiot. The measures Mr Wheatley outlined were as ever designed to protect people from themselves. It is all rather akin to blaming Thompsons when you get sunburnt on holiday.

    Is regulation really about protecting fools from themselves and thereby disadvantaging those with a modicum of intelligence and fettering those in the industry with ever more red tape and fatuous paperwork?

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm