View more on these topics

FCA confirms Woodford investigation after year-long concerns

Neil Woodford

Responding to concerns over the suspended Woodford fund, the FCA has said it first contacted the fund’s legal owner about risks in February 2018, and is now investigating events that led to the suspension.

In a letter to Treasury Select Committee chair Nicky Morgan, the FCA’s chief executive Andrew Bailey said the regulator was first in touch with the management of Woodford Equity Income Fund last year, regarding the fund’s regulatory breaches.

The letter was a response to Morgan’s query from June 10, 2019 where she asked the FCA to provide a timeline of the FCA’s supervisory contact with the fund.

MPs quiz Hargreaves on Woodford links

Today, Bailey said the FCA engaged with Link Fund Solution – which acted as the the fund’s authorised corporate director and its legal owner – in February 2018 and then again in March 2018, regarding the WEIF’s two breaches of 10 per cent limit on the maximum proportion of unlisted securities held within WEIF.

The FCA said following its engagement, the breaches were resolved within the agreed time-frame. Following this, the FCA then continued to monitor deteriorating liquidity position of the fund monthly since April 2018 to December 2018.

In the letter, Bailey confirms to Morgan the FCA has opened an investigation into events leading to the suspension of Woodford Equity Income Fund but that he “cannot comment any further.”

Hargreaves boss could pass up bonus after Woodford fallout

The flagship fund was suspended on 3 June after the fund came under scrutiny by industry experts due to rapid outflows and underperformance in recent months.

In an announcement the fund said it is “in the best interest of all investors in the fund” to suspend issue, cancellation, sale, redemption and transfer of shares in the fund.

Chris Gilchrist: Woodford’s management now under the microscope

The idea behind the decision was to allow Woodford time to reposition the element of the fund’s portfolio invested in unquoted and illiquid stocks in to more liquid investments.

Since the announcement, Hargreaves Lansdown has removed the fund and the Woodford Income Focus fund from its Wealth 50 list.

Advice giant St James’s Place terminated a £3.5bn management agreement with Woodford, passing the mandate to Columbia Threadneedle and RWC Partners.

MP and Treasury committee chair Nicky Morgan had asked the FCA for information about how it had managed the issue and whether Woodford Investment Management should stop charging a management fee while the fund is suspended.


Schroders sets date for financial planning clients’ move to new platform

Schroders has confirmed that all existing Lloyds financial advice clients will transition to the Fusion platform from next month onwards, as its planning joint venture with the bank has officially launched. Yesterday, 500 staff formally transferred to Schroders Personal Wealth. The new planning business will be available to current Lloyds advice customers from the summer, […]


L&G launches rental protection product with Mortgage Advice Bureau

Legal & General has announced the completion of a rental protection plan pilot, carried out in conjunction with Mortgage Advice Bureau. According to the firm, it is the first major protection provider to develop a protection product specifically for the private rented sector. The plan offers the choice of three products: ‘rental income protection benefit’, […]


Labour outlines plans for new property taxes

A Labour government would seek to bring in a progressive property tax to replace council tax and eradicate stamp duty for those buying property to live in themselves. This would be payable by owners rather than tenants, and empty homes and second homes would be taxed at a higher rate, along with the capital gains […]


What does the future hold for chartered status?

With the title causing contention among advisers, the profession asks whether it remains the gold standard While Level 6 qualifications are often billed as one of the biggest differentiators between advisers in the profession, the debate over their relevance is continuous. Lauded as the “gold standard of financial planning”, holding chartered status continues to cause […]

Tax avoidance (the fight goes on)

In recent times, we have witnessed high-profile celebrities and sports stars make the headlines for potential tax liabilities on ‘failed’ tax avoidance schemes. We are now used to reading about these individuals, but what about those who advise on such schemes? Read more


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 5 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I this true? Year long concerns before the Regulator gets off its backside and actually does something? If so – incredible!

  2. I am guessing that the fall guys for this will be the advisers.

  3. As with Equitable Life there has probably been a lot of denial in high places, until the facts are unavoidable.

    In the end the outcome may be more favourable than expected, but we are all governed by sets of rules which protect consumers from financial loss and any breaches should be investigated at the first opportunity.

  4. Julian Stevens 19th June 2019 at 8:57 am

    If, following the FCA’s intervention, the two breaches [of the maximum proportion of unlisted securities held within the fund] “were resolved within the agreed time-frame”, why did the fund’s liquidity position continue to deteriorate month by month after April 2018? On one hand Mr Bailey has claimed that the action the FCA took sorted out the problem but it seems that it did no such thing. The fund’s course towards having to be suspended seems to have continued unchecked.

    Just what is the basis of Mr Bailey’s statement that he “cannot comment any further”? In Ms. Morgan’s position, I’d tell him in no uncertain terms that the Committee requires his further comments, now and in full, without further obfuscation.

  5. All to often, too little too late …

    The FCA, seems to have a recurring theme …

    I would like to hear a valid excuse, understaffed and underfunded are obviously null and void ….

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm