View more on these topics

FCA censures death bond firm Catalyst and seeks to fine directors £550k

The FCA has censured Catalyst Investment Group for “recklessly misleading” investors when promoting bonds issued by Luxembourg-based life settlement vehicle ARM Asset Backed Securities.

Catalyst has been censured as it is in default and is unable to pay a fine. The FCA would have otherwise imposed a penalty of £450,000.

The FCA is also seeking to ban Catalyst chief executive Timothy Roberts and fine him £450,000, and to ban Catalyst director Andrew Wilkins from senior financial services roles and fine Wilkins £100,000. Both men have referred their cases to the Upper Tribunal.

Catalyst was the UK marketing and distribution agent for ARM, and offered bonds issued by ARM to UK advisers, who in turn sold them to retail investors. The bonds, which were backed by life settlement policies, were sold to investors in the UK and Europe without ARM having the appropriate permissions.

UK investors have invested a total of £54m in ARM bonds.

The FCA says Catalyst knew ARM had applied for a licence from the Luxembourg regulator the CSSF in July 2009, and had been asked to stop issuing bonds in November 2009 pending a decision.

However, Catalyst continued to accept funds from investors without disclosing ARM’s position, or the risk that ARM could be liquidated if its licence application failed.  

Catalyst also wrote to advisers and investors on separate occasions suggesting ARM’s licence application was voluntary, but did not spell out the implications if the licence was not granted.

The company’s former compliance officer, Alison Moran has been fined £20,000 for failing to ensure the issues around ARM’s licence were communicated properly to investors, despite being aware there were problems since December 2009.

FCA director of enforcement and financial crime Tracey McDermott says: “Catalyst showed a reckless disregard for investors’ interests, exposing them to significant risks. We expect firms, and their senior managers, to put customers’ needs first – and will take tough action against those who fall short of our standards.”

Rockingham Independent, which was declared in default in November, advised at least 200 sales of ARM bonds to UK investors. ARM bonds were one of the underlying investments behind Rockingham’s Rita product, a 10-year annuity product wrapped in a Sipp. 

In March the Financial Services Compensation Scheme rejected compensation claims from Rockingham clients on the basis that the cause of the investors’ losses was the decision of the Luxembourg regulator to reject ARM’s application for authorisation, rather than poor investment advice.

The FSCS is now reviewing its decision to reject claims in light of new evidence.

The FSA fined Rockingham £35,000 in September 2011 and imposed partial bans on its directors over sales of ARM bonds and unregulated collective investment schemes. 



Allfunds appoints ex-Cofunds BDM

Platform provider Allfunds has appointed Cofunds business development manager Bradley Lewis as head of sales and relationship management for the UK and Ireland. Lewis will work under Stephen Mohan commercial director for UK and Ireland operation who joined from Cofunds at the end of April 2013. Mohan says: “Bradley’s appointment is an important development in the […]

Tony Wickenden: Downton Abbey lessons on will writing

The Sunday night Downton fest and the preceding X Factor competition represents a juxtaposition that may, at first sight, seem strange and then on reflection be appreciated as being somewhat aligned. One has affected voices, histrionics, desperation and tears and the other is the X Factor. I appreciate that I am way behind the journalistic curve by referencing Downton though. […]


Nutmeg launches ‘fat cat’ ad campaign against fund groups

Online discretionary fund manager Nutmeg has launched a high profile new advertising campaign on London Underground attacking the fund management industry.  The direct-to-consumer platform has used adverts depicting fund managers as “fat cats”, adding that its own DFM proposition has no hidden charges. The advert, which features the slogan “Does your investment manager skim off […]


Lawyer warns advisers should offer low cost alternative with recommendation

Advisers should ensure they discuss a lower risk alternative investment product alongside the investment strategy they ultimately recommend in order to mitigate the chance of future legal claims, a lawyer has warned.  Speaking at the IFP Conference at the Celtic Manor in Wales today, Clarke Willmott associate Philippa Hann said the majority of cases she […]

Guide cover resized

Guide: Johnson Fleming’s managed auto-enrolment service for SMEs

Johnson Fleming has launched its new managed auto-enrolment service, designed to support SME businesses of up to 250 employees. The managed auto-enrolment service is not just about providing businesses with a software system for them to manage themselves, but more about outsourcing the administration of the project and scheme to Johnson Fleming’s auto-enrolment staff.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There are 4 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. This is not to excuse the firm or its directors. However I do wish journalists (and the Regulator for that matter) would stop using pejorative and inflammatory titles.

    Viatical settlements when properly managed are in fact a virtuous circle. A terminally ill person can access the money, which he otherwise would be unable to do – and the purchaser can make an uncorrelated investment with the possibility of a reasonable return. Neither the seller nor the purchasers have their arms twisted.

    Can someone tell me what’s wrong with that?

  2. Test comment Ian Rose

  3. Test comment 2 ian

  4. More to the point, if “Catalyst was the UK marketing and distribution agent for ARM, and offered bonds issued by ARM to UK advisers, who in turn sold them to retail investors. The bonds, which were backed by life settlement policies, were sold to investors in the UK and Europe without ARM having the appropriate permissions” why are advisers made to pay, yet again, for the sins of other parties in the distribution chain??
    If the marketers and distributors recklessly misled advisers and investors, and advised investors without permission (unauthorised activities are a criminal office I think?) then the inability of Catalyst to pay their fines should not inexorably lead one to conclude that other authorised advisers should pick up the tab on their behalf.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm