View more on these topics

FCA: British Steel complainants should discuss options with FOS

Construction Building 480The FCA has urged those with complaints over the British Steel Pension Scheme to discuss how to proceed with the Financial Ombudsman Service after one of the advice firms at the centre of the scandal filed for liquidation.

Yesterday, the Financial Services Compensation Scheme said that it was preparing to declare Active Wealth in default, opening the door to compensation payouts from the lifeboat fund.

However, some clients have already lodged grievances with the FOS over unsuitable advice.

The FOS can only handle complaints relating to solvent firms, while the FSCS can only pay out compensation once it is convinced that a firm can no longer field its own liabilities and clients have a valid case.

This could leave clients in limbo with the FOS unable to continue processing their complaint once Active Wealth has been declared in default by the FSCS and before it is passed over to new handlers.

There is also a different standard of judgment used by both services: FOS rules on complaints based on what it considers fair and reasonable, whereas the FSCS operates on a civil liabilities test, paying out if it considers that a court claim would have succeeded.

A note published by the FCA on its website reads: “BSPS members who were considering raising a complaint following the joint letter from the FCA, the Pensions Regulator and the Pensions Advisory Service should contact the Financial Services Compensation Scheme to discuss how to register a claim.

“BSPS members who have already complained to the Financial Ombudsman Service should speak to their case handler to discuss next steps, including whether their complaint will be transferred to the FSCS for consideration.”



British Steel adviser explains ongoing charges calculation to MPs

Active Wealth director Darren Reynolds has emphasised that ongoing adviser charges for British Steel clients have not been calculated as a percentage of their funds. In a letter addressed to work and pensions select committee chairman and MP Frank Field, Reynolds reveals more details about the way approximately 300 British Steel clients were advised by […]


Aegon assets hit £117bn

Net inflows of £2.1bn in Q4 have taken Aegon’s platform assets to £117bn, its full-year results reveal. In the UK, earnings for Q4 were stable at €23m (£22bn), with life earnings and the protection business in line with earnings from 2016. Full year earnings increased 94 per cent to £109m. Aegon UK chief executive Adrian […]

What goes on behind the scenes when a platform changes technology?

No amount of rigorous testing can eliminate all the teething problems when hundreds of thousands of client accounts are being moved With multiple platforms undergoing technology changes, advisers are having their work disrupted by businesses moving their clients’ data. Two significant client data migrations have taken place in the past two months, with Aegon moving […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. If a claim is accepted by the FSCS it is worth bearing in mind that, in accepting FSCS compensation which will be capped at £50,000, a claimant will need to assign their rights of action in respect of any other entity which might also be responsible for their losses. Anyone considering making a claim to the FSCS will want to ensure that they have considered all other avenues prior to accepting any payment.

Leave a comment