View more on these topics

FCA bans and fines sole trader £1m for sale and rent back failings

FCA-MM_HOMEPAGE-INDEX.jpg

The Financial Conduct Authority has imposed its largest ever fine of almost £1m on a retail sole trader for “deliberately misleading” vulnerable customers over sale and rent back agreements.

Birmingham-based Gurpreet Singh Chadda, who traded under the names Red2Black Homes and B&L Homes, has been fined £945,277 and banned from working in the financial services industry.

The FCA investigated Chadda’s involvement in seven sale and rent back transactions between June 2009 and January 2010 and found serious failings in all of them.

Under sale and rent back deals, homeowners sell their home and rent it back from the person arranging the transaction. The deals allow homeowners, who may be selling due to financial difficulties and a need to raise money to pay arrears, to stay in their homes and avoid repossession.

Chadda misled homeowners selling their properties by telling them he would be buying their homes, when the homes were actually being bought by other people.

He failed to notify sellers that buyers were not authorised or regulated by the FCA, which meant they would be unable to complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service or the Financial Services Compensation Scheme if something went wrong.

Chadda also helped buyers obtain mortgages based on misleading information; falsely claimed that properties would be sold based on an independent valuation; and misled sellers about how much their properties were worth.

The FCA also said sellers were charged “grossly unfair and excessive hidden fees”.

In three cases sellers got less than half of the value of their property, and in two out of the three cases the seller received only 38 per cent of the sale price of their homes. Meanwhile Chadda was receiving the full price for the properties from the buyers. 

The FCA believes Chadda was paid £695,277 from the seven transactions. His penalty including the recouping of these charges.

Chadda failed to disclose relevant information to the FCA, created misleading documents, and arranged for people to impersonate his customers in order to mislead the FCA.

FCA director of enforcement and financial crime Tracey McDermott says: ”Chadda’s misconduct is the most shocking we have seen from a home finance arranger. He is a disgrace to financial services.

“He deliberately misled his clients for his own personal gain and then repeatedly and cynically lied to the FCA. Chadda is not fit to work in regulated financial services and he presents a serious risk to customers and lenders alike with his dishonest and unscrupulous actions. The unprecedented level of the fine for a sole trader reflects our determination to deprive him of the gains he made as a result of his misconduct.”

Recommended

Cross-party peers fight for regulated LTC advice referrals in Care bill

Cross-party peers have tabled amendments to the Care bill to force local authorities to explicitly refer people to regulated financial advice when funding care costs. The bill, published last month and currently being debated in the House of Lords, sets out a requirement for local authorities to signpost care funders to “independent” financial advice but […]

IFA View: Nurturing Generation Y

Last Saturday I visited students from The Financial Adviser School at one of our weekend classroom events. At this particular session the students were working on role-play scenarios as part of their training to become professional financial advisers It is extraordinary to see so much talent in one room; a group with so much enthusiasm […]

L&G formulating plans to enter house building market

Legal & General is formulating plans to start building homes on land it owns to help address the UK’s housing shortage. Speaking at the L&G Mortgage Club annual awards last week, group executive director of protection and annuities John Pollock said the group hopes to be celebrating its mortgage club’s 21st birthday in three years’ […]

Axa Elevate parent posts £30m loss

Axa Portfolio Services, the parent company of the Axa Elevate platform, has posted a £30m pre-tax loss for 2012 after spending £12.7m on platform development. APS is also the parent company of Axa’s direct platform, Axa Self Investor, and administrates Axa’s pension schemes and Isas. The losses are a slight improvement on 2011 when the […]

Oil industry: only the fittest will survive

The actions of OPEC have forced the oil supply to fall and producers to cut costs and rationalise, says Richard Hulf In an interview with journalist Alexis Xydias, Richard Hulf, manager of the Artemis Global Energy Fund, explains the impact of the fall in the oil price on energy companies. Alexis also quizzes Richard on […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 6 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. I understand that this con artist totally misled his clients, and in half the cases, they received less than 50% of the true value of their properties.

    Furthermore, he misled the FCA at every turn – and even arranged for friends to impersonate his clients during meetings with the FCA!!!

    He shouldn’t just be fined – he should be sent straight to jail.

  2. I totally agree. What else has to be done?

  3. Soren Lorenson 19th June 2013 at 2:28 pm

    Elsewhere on this site is the story about the requirement for the FCA to slim down and reduce its costs.

    This case is a good catch and just what the FCA should be about.

    However I can’t help thinking that such cases come along rarely and can be fought without the massive regulatory cost and admin burden that is placed on the rest of us.

  4. Why wasn’t this case dealth with by the SFO?

  5. @ Sean: Becuase it’s too small for the SFO to get involved, and it doesn’t meet any of their other criteria (e.g., complexity) either.

  6. I got approached by this guy in 2011 about buying a property with ‘no money down’. Basically lying to the lender on the valuation of the property to acquire a 100% mortgage. The guy was so arrogant and cocky about his scam but that was nothing compared to his partner. She’s clearly the brains behind the operation. Amazed she got away without a mention. Talking about it to other investors I later found out there married. They drive around in a Mercedes with WIFEY on the number plate lol !!!
    Amazed he’s not been arrested yet. Do you think he’ll go to jail for this????

Leave a comment