View more on these topics

Fate of engineering

A few years ago, a product provider invited me to speak on the subject of investment and income drawdown. At that time, according to FSA statistics, the leading investment choice when taking the drawdown route was with-profits.

While I accept that Equitable skewed the figures, there were still an unacceptable number of IFAs suggesting that with-profits was the answer, irrespective of the questions posed by the client&#39s income profile and term to final vesting.

The section of my presentation which focused on with-profits carried the title, With-profits – I Never Liked It Since I First Understood It. This was not my attempt to be headhunted as a headline writer for the News of the World, far from it, it was a genuine attempt to impress on others that a more careful scrutiny of with-profits was long overdue.

The recent history of with-profits has demonstrated the perils of a generic title being applied to a non-generic investment option. Don&#39t get me wrong, I believe there is a place for with-profits in its purest form but that does not include the market value adjuster. Investors find the idea of smoothed returns highly acceptable but the use of the MVA makes a mockery of that concept.

Imagine for a moment that with-profits was a car. The car salesman would explain that the performance of the car was well in excess of the competition. What he would forget to mention is that the performance would not last if the actuarial mechanic was allowed to service the car. Once the actuarial mechanic had fitted the market velocity adjuster, the maximum speed would no longer be based on the original tuning of the car or its age and condition but remotely controlled by the actuarial mechanic.

Matters might then take a turn for the worse and the Government would compel a move to unleaded fuel (pensions compulsion being too difficult) which meant that performance would fall away even more. Customers would sue the car salesmen, arguing that they were missold the car and were never advised of the risks.

Motor magazines would turn on the garages, despite singing the praises of this car in previous issues. The fact that many of these budding Jeremy Clarksons had previously been in the personal finance sector was purely coincidental.

My comments on cars may be seen as inappropriate but then so were some of the actions taken by providers regarding with-profits.

A former product actuary at Equitable once suggested that MVAs were reasonable as they put the investor in the same position as they would have been had they been in an equity fund. When asked what was the point of investing in with-profits in the first place, he did not respond.

With-profits was a product designed for an era of low persistency where the number of maturing policies was in double figures only.

The game of telephone number projections which kicked off in the early 1980s created an illusion of expert investment managers. In reality, these plans were as hyped as the cars I talked about earlier. I can only assume that the hope was that they would not all be put to the test.

No doubt those fans of with-profits will be inspired to chastise me, suggesting that my analogy with cars is unfair. If with-profits in its current form lasts as long as my current car, then I may reconsider but I doubt that it will.

Recommended

The industry must be freed from its regulatory shackles

Open letter to Treasury Financial Secretary Ruth KellyI am a retired IFA. I and about 500 others helped form the Life Insurance Association, played an active role trying to get North American-type regulation introduced and was at one time a member of the Labour City committee. I was a trade union official and was briefly […]

Awash on the currency

If the Government sticks to its original plan for entry into the European single currency, in less than 30 months UK advisers could be assessing their clients&#39 policies and portfolios in euros and cents. Yet more pressing industry issues such as Sandler, Pickering and depolarisation mean that many advisers and product providers have ignored the […]

Fidelity warning over top-up fees

The plans for top-up university fees mean that parents and grandparents should start saving for children&#39s education, says Fidelity. At present, only 6 per cent of 35-54-year-olds investing in an Isa are saving for future education for their children, according to research commissioned by Fidelity. Only 2 per cent of people of grandparent age are […]

Income sector is Cofunds&#39 top seller

Seven of Cofunds&#39 top 10 biggest-selling funds last year were income funds, toppling UK growth as the most popular sector on the platform. The supermarket&#39s sales figures for 2002 show that five of its top 10 funds were equity income funds while two were bond funds. In 2001, just two of the top 10 were […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com