View more on these topics

Farrow&#39s view

It is unlikely to outsell Harry Potter or get nominated for the Booker prize but Andrew Adams, a lecturer at Edinburgh University, is extremely proud of his new book The Split Capital Investment Trust Crisis.

Not the sexiest of titles admittedly, but I suspect that lawyers may have had intervened if the words “magic circle”, “corruption” or “collusion” had been used.

The timing of the book may raise a few eyebrows, particularly among the 50,000 investors who have lost money in splits because for them, the book is far from closed. It is almost two years to the week that the Treasury Select Committee summoned those at the heart of the scandal, including the AITC, the FSA and Aberdeen, for a second grilling. People are still waiting for compensation.

There is hope, of course: 16 of the 22 groups being investigated by the FSA have raised around £150m, with the three big banks – UBS, ABN Amro and HSBC – supposedly putting £50m into the pot. If a deal can be struck with the PI insurers another £50m-£60m may be added to the settlement figure. With a bit of luck a total of around £270m plus could be on offer to split cap victims.

But investors hoping to get a handout this side of Christmas will be disappointed. Raising the money is just the first hurdle. How much each fund manager stumps up is still unknown, although Aberdeen is sure to be the top payer. There are already rumours that a couple of groups involved, BC Asset Management and BFS, are pleading poverty, while two others, Teather & Greenwood and Royal London, are not playing ball.

Even when all the money has been counted up, there is the complex issue of how the money is divided. Who gets the money and how much are set to be massive stumbling blocks. For example, will people who have been investigated for the alleged collusion, or made money out of splits before their demise, benefit from any compensation if they are still investors in splits?

The sad truth is that, as Adams admits in his book, compensation could be a long time coming.

The 240-page book has chapters from John McFall, the outspoken chairman of the Treasury Select Committee, and Aberdeen&#39s Piers Currie, who experienced at first hand one of McFall&#39s interrogations.

There is also a damning chapter by Adams on the press coverage. He says the general standard of reporting “varied enormously… much of it was poor”, adding that there was “a general lack of understanding of the products involved” and the press “relied on &#39experts&#39 who had a vested interest in the success of the splits market”. He also notes how the positive tone of splits was swiftly followed by very negative comment when the “chickens came home to roost”.

Many of the points Adams makes are difficult to disagree with, particularly the overtly positive coverage of zeros.

The answer, he suggests – and not for the first time – is a qualification devoted to financial journalism. Alternatively journalists should be encouraged to take the Financial Planning Certificate or Investment Management Certificate exams. But does Adams really believe that journalists with an FPC or IMC qualification would have unearthed the complexities of splits? I&#39m not so sure. How many IFAs and stockbrokers foresaw the crisis? Even the FSA failed to do so – it still labelled zeros as low risk as late as June 2002, while Adams&#39 own paper – For Whom the Barbell Tolls – was not published until April 2001, too late for most investors.

These are not excuses. There will be very few, if any, personal finance journalists (myself included) who have not in the past described zeros as “low risk”. A couple of journalists, Jean Eaglesham in 1998 and Lawrence Lever in 1999, were way ahead of the crowd in spotting a potential “pack of cards” scenario. But should more journalists have questioned the structure of split capital trusts earlier than they did? Undoubtedly, yes. Have we learned some lessons? I suspect we have.

Personal finance journalists rely heavily on informed opinion from people working within financial services, be they IFAs, fund managers, analysts or independent consultants. Most will have a vested interest of some description and it is our job to spot when we have been thrown a line. In the case of splits many people, not just journalists, failed to see what was coming and for that we are all to blame.

Paul Farrow is a perso-nal finance reporter at the Sunday Telegraph

Recommended

Keydata unlocks income generator

Keydata Investments has brought out issue 12 of the extra income plan, an income-producing capital-protected bond that is linked to the performance of the FTSE 100 over a five-year term. Investors can choose from annual income at 6 per cent gross, quarterly income of 1.41 per cent gross or rolled-up income at 35 per cent […]

Regulation reminders

I was delighted that the ombudsman was misquoted as saying it expected 20,000 mortgage complaints in the year ahead. I understand the Mortgage Code Arbitration Scheme received 98 complaints last year and a total of 46 were upheld. I was staggered to think that the level of dissatisfaction could increase by a factor of, well, […]

Just Retirement joins the Exchange annuity service

IFA portal the Exchange has re-designed its annuity service and specialist enhanced annuities provider Just Retirement, has joined the service. The total number of providers available through the portal is now 16.

What&#39s the word on standards?

Is it me or has the standard of punctuation by mortgage companies gone to the dogs? We have been trying, since September to get Woolwich to put an apostrophe into applicant&#39s (as in the applicant&#39s existing mortgage) in their offer letter to a client for a remortgage. You would not believe the palaver this has […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com