View more on these topics

Eversheds cautions against FOS naming and shaming

Lord Hunt’s recommendation for the Financial Ombudsman Services to introduce a name and shame system could portray firms in a misleading light, according to law firm Eversheds.

The Hunt Review called for increased openness and greater transparency of the FOS’s methodology and policy in handling cases.

But Eversheds financial services litigation partner Chris Busby says data on specific financial institutions can be misleading.

He says: “They may excel in one area but be weaker in another, leading to an overall average score which gives a false impression.

“The decision to name and shame will be unpopular within the financial services industry, due to the likelihood that data published will often relate to historic products or be judged out of context. For example, large numbers of claims concerning individual product issues such as payment protection insurance will significantly affect any figures at present for those who historically sold this product.”


Kim lerche-thomsen

Since Living Time was launched in November 2006, chief executive Kim Lerche-Thomsen has been keen to get the word out about a new way of pension planning.

McFall: Why buy a with-profits policy?

Treasury Select Committee chairman John McFall has questioned why anyone would buy a with-profits policy when shareholders can “raid” the inherited estates created from the funds at any time.


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment