View more on these topics

Euro ruling to bring massive shake-up

The UK insurance market is preparing for radical reform after the European Court of Justice ruled gender pricing for insurance products will be banned from December 21, 2012.

The ruling follows an opinion from advocate general Juliane Kokott last year that using gender as a risk factor when pricing insurance is discriminatory.

Pension provider AJ Bell says the ruling will cost a man with a £100,000 pension pot an average of £12,000 while the ABI says male annuity rates could fall by 8 per cent and women’s rates could rise by 6 per cent.

Protection providers will have to equalise premiums for life insurance, income protection and critical-illness cover.

Currently, women pay less for life insurance due to their longer life expectancy but pay more for income protection.

Hargreaves Lansdown head of pensions research Tom McPhail says the decision, announced on Tuesday, will lead to “a seismic shift” in the retirement market.

He says: “It is now imperative that every investor shops around with their pension fund at retirement because if they do not, they risk ending up with a homogenised standard-issue annuity that is almost certain to be a poor deal.”

Just Retirement external affairs director Steve Lowe says: “This will give providers an opportunity to reinvent themselves because in the future they will need to provide individual, personalised underwriting. They will need to use many, many factors beyond the blunt instruments of gender and postcode.”

Legal & General head of annuity product developments Tim Gosden says: “I think you could argue the days of the conventional standard annuity are numbered now and as the enhanced annuity market develops you could argue that gender is actually less of a factor as medical and lifestyle rating factors kick in.”

In the interim, providers say women could choose to defer annuity purchase to benefit from the anticipated increase.

LV= head of annuities Matt Trott says: “Rates for females are likely to improve significantly, so advisers need to consider how this affects their clients.”

Protection experts question whether the ruling will also apply to gender-based underwriting decisions and if it will eventually be extended to include factors such as age and disability.

Recommended

52

ECJ rules insurers cannot price on gender

The European Court of Justice has ruled that insurers cannot price products based on gender from December 21, 2012. The move will mean that providers will radically have to change the way they price annuities, life insurance, and health insurance. The ruling follows a test case brought by Belgian consumer group Test-Achats which questioned whether […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 2 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. The problem is that by taking away gender based pricing a further set of inequalities will be introduced such as socio-economic factors, as illustrated by David Trenners comments on pensions and Kevin Carrs comments on protection. So the industry scraps one form or discrimination for another increasing the cost of products for those who are now poorly served by the state and by our industry.

    The selection process i.e. differential pricing and underwriting is by its own nature discriminatory, there is no getting away from it. But if the civil rights lobby have their way then age and health will be next on the agenda (as they are both included within the scope of the same EU treaty) and Roger Edwards predictions will become reality.

    And finally, where were the ABI in this? Total silence? Another great behind the scenes victory for them, eh! What a waste of space that organisation is…

  2. We should write to all clients who are due to retire in the next 2-3 years and explain to them that they will very likely get a smaller pension from their fund after December this year.

Leave a comment