View more on these topics

EU policymakers reach deal over controversial trusts plans

European policymakers have reached a deal over controversial plans to give the public access to registers of beneficial owners of trusts and shares.

In a deal struck last night by negotiators on the draft anti-money laundering directive, members of the public with a “legitimate interest” will be able to access information about the owners of shares, but there will be no public access to information about the owners of trusts.

The deal is a victory for the UK after experts raised concerns about making public details of consumers in simple arrangements, such as parents putting a property into trust for their children.

In February, the European Parliament set out plans for the ultimate owners of companies and legal entities such as trusts to be listed in public registers to help fight money launderung. 

Last week Money Marketing reported policymakers were at loggerheads over the proposals, with the parliament pushing for full transparency and the council opposing it.

In an announcement today, the parliament says registers of the ultimate owners of companies will be accessible by competent authorities and their financial intelligence units, as well as people with a “legitimate interest”, such as investigative journalists and concerned citizens.

Personal details will include the beneficial owner’s name, month and year of birth, nationality, residency and details of ownership.

Registers of the beneficial owners of trusts, however, will only be accessible by competent authorities and their financial intelligence units.

Civil Liberties Committee rapporteur Judith Sargentini says: “The new rules agreed today will provide much greater transparency of the shadowy business structures that are at the heart of money laundering schemes, as well as schemes used by businesses to avoid their tax responsibility.”

Cicero senior executive Alexander Kneepkens says: “Negotiators reached a deal late last night in a seven-hour trilogue session. The exact definition of those with a ‘legitimate interest’ is unclear and likely to be determined by member states.

“The different approach for trusts is very sensible and another example of the UK still being very influential in the council when it comes to financial services.”

Wealth Management Association deputy chief executive John Barrass says: “I am particularly pleased to see that access to the register by persons with a legitimate interest does not extend to trusts.

”UK trusts are unlike those on the continent and access by the public to information on trusts recorded in the register could have risked revealing highly private information about ordinary individuals and families which is normally protected. This might have had damaging consequences in society as a whole. 

“It’s good to see UK views having a positive effect in the trilogue negotiations.”



Lenders face tougher checks on capital

Banks will see their calculations of how much capital they hold checked by auditors for the first time under new plans to be set out this week. The Financial Times reports the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales will publish proposals this week which would see auditors review how banks work out their […]


Scottish Widows data protection error could cost customer £50k

A Scottish Widows customer claims the provider has cost him £50,000 after it breached the Data Protection Act by sending details of his pension to his ex-wife. The provider has offered the customer, who cannot be named for legal reasons, £500 in compensation for sending the information to an unauthorised address. But the customer says […]


Guernsey cells win £22m legal battle against Arch Financial

The board of 18 Guernsey-listed cell companies that made up the Arch cru fund have won a £22m High Court case against the fund manager behind the range. Arch Financial and its chief executive Robin Farrell have been ordered to pay £22m, plus interest and costs, to SPL Guernsey ICC. In April 2012, the board […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. ““The different approach for trusts is very sensible …”….only sensible if beneficiaries of pure protection life policy trusts are excluded or if there is a de minimis trust value exemption which again effectively excludes them while the policy is in force.

    But if not…
    For those of us who actually care that so many policies are being put in place in a manner guaranteed to delay pay-out beyond what claimants expect or should have to endure, this is yet another barrier to getting it done right.

    Another advice /product suitability minefield ready to blow up.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm