View more on these topics

Employers need advice

For the vast majority of employers, the days when it was possible to ignore pension provision are numbered. By October 8, 2001, all employers should have carried out an audit of their pension provision. Failure to comply with the new requirements could result in a fine from Opra. The safest approach for any employer is to seek pension specialist advice from an IFA.


With pension advice likely to be in great demand over the coming year, the sooner the process starts the better.


The first step in the audit involves an employee headcount. Under the stakeholder regulations, any employer with five or more employees will have new obligations. For this purpose, all employees count, including part-timers, and, to be on the safe side, even controlling directors.


Despite certain incorrect industry reports, even those earning below the lower earnings&#39 limit (LEL) must be included in the headcount.


An employer with fewer than five employees, but with expansion plans, should be made aware that the stakeholder obligations bite within three months of employing the fifth employee.


Unless exempt on grounds of having four or fewer employees, the employer must proceed to stage two.


The first question here is does the employer offer an existing form of pension? If so, he may be exempt from offering stakeholder but only if the scheme meets certain criteria.


These criteria differ, depending on whether the scheme is occupational or group personal pension (GPP).


I suspect few employers would feel comfortable assessing whether they are exempt, without help from an IFA.



Occupational scheme criteria


The employer must offer all “relevant employees” membership of an occupational scheme. If they offered employees membership at some earlier time, but some employees did not join, there is no need to re-offer membership to these employees.


Relevant employees are those aged 18 or over with at least five years to go to the scheme&#39s normal retirement age (NRA). Here, those earning below the LEL can also be excluded. The scheme can have a waiting period of not more than 12 months.



GPP criteria


The conditions here are slightly different. All employees aged 18 or above and earning above the LEL must be offered the opportunity to join the GPP. There is no upper age as under GPPs there is no NRA. Here, the waiting period cannot exceed three months.


Importantly, the employer must formally offer (within the contract of employment or in some other demonstrable manner) to pay at least 3 per cent of basic salary on behalf of each employee who chooses to join.


The employer can make his contribution conditional on the employee also contributing up to 3 per cent.


For employees who are already GPP members prior to October 8, 2001, the emp loyer can continue to req uire higher employee contributions provided he is at least matching these.


Joiners after October 8, 2001 cannot be required to pay above 3 per cent. To avoid doubt, there is no need for the GPP to have a stakeholder-style charging structure or to comply with the 1 per cent limit. This creates more flexibility.


If the employer is offering a scheme which fails on one or more detail, then the IFA can advise on how to change the scheme design or eligibility requirements to obtain stakeholder exemption. If an employer does not want to make such adjustments, then he will have to offer a stakeholder scheme in parallel to the existing scheme.


If an employer offers no pension provision to employees, then he will need advice on what to put in place. Some employers will not be prepared to make any employer contribution in which case, their only option is stakeholder.


Even then, they need to choose between available stakeholder schemes offered by financial services companies, unions and affinity groups.


All the signs are there will be a significant number to choose between and, while there will be differences in areas such as investment choice, default funds, technological support, helpline facilities and mechanisms for getting advice, these may not be obvious to the untrained eye. The IFA can give the employer confidence that he has designated the most appropriate scheme for his workforce.


Where an employer is prepared to make a contribution, his options – and hence his need for advice – widen substantially. The employer might consider setting up a new occupational money purchase scheme. Perhaps more likely, he may consider a GPP which among other things has the relative advantage of less onerous employer involvement and better contracting out terms than the occupational route.


Employers may, of course, ask why they should consider any alternative to stakeholder, which they may also contribute to if they wish.


There are a number of considerations. First, GPPs will continue to have wider investment choice, including with-profits (which has effectively been ruled out of stakeholder), a self-investment option and external fund links. It can include integral life cover and, for members who join before April 6, 2001, waiver of premium with contributions qualifying for tax relief.


Importantly, as there is no constraint on the charging structure, a GPP can also offer in-built advice, paid for by a slightly higher charge. This is particularly attractive where many of the work force would benefit from personalised advice as it is being paid for out of premiums which have received tax relief.


Under stakeholder, personalised advice will be paid for through a separate contract which will not attract tax relief.


Over the next 14 months, there are very few employers which can safely ignore pensions. For some of the very smallest, it may be relatively straightforward to confirm that due to having fewer than five employees, they are under no obligation to take further action. Of course, having raised the issue of pension provision, some may decide to introduce something voluntarily.


For many others, next October becomes the deadline for either improving existing provision or for choosing the most appropriate new pension arrangement for their workforce. Also, in many cases, the senior executives will want to consider whether they should join the main scheme or opt for an alternative tailored to their circumstances.


In all the above situations, there is a key role to play for pension specialist IFAs.

Recommended

Minor information

Returning to trustee investments following our diversion into Individual Pension Accounts, in the July 20 edition I related the story of the Jersey trust that was to be varied to permit transfers of trust property to take place. There were minor trust beneficiaries, which was the reason for needing to go to court for variation.The […]

IFAs get credit as Skandia surges

Skandia Group claims its faith in the IFA market is responsible for a 102 per cent surge in new business in the six months to June 30.The results move Skandia into the ranks of top-performing life offices for IFA business although direct com-parisons are difficult because offices calculate the figures in different ways.Equivalent premium income […]

Headaches

The impending arrival of stakeholder pensions has given IFAs some headaches over the past couple of years.RU64, issued in April 1999, left many IFAs puzzled over the precise meaning of “material disadvantage” if a policyholder elects to switch to a stakeholder pension from a personal pension.Advisers recommending the current range of personal pensions must explain […]

Bulldog barks but fails to put the bite on Equitable

The British bulldog was barking at the inaugural meeting of the Equitable Members Action Group but the bite was missing.Indeed, the meeting ofthe self-styled action group, which is hoping to salvage Equitable Life&#39s mutual status, was notable mainly for its lack of action.Fewer than a dozen men in pinstriped suits spent the evening lounging in […]

International jurisdictions

By Neil Jones, Canada Life Investing through international providers has grown in popularity over recent years as investors seek out the benefits of gross roll-up and the wider range of investment options that can be available. When considering a recommendation for a lump sum investment, not only does the adviser have to select a suitable tax wrapper […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment