View more on these topics

Employee trusts: deductability of contributions

In the case of Mawsley Machinery Ltd -v- Robinson, which was heard by a Special Commissioner, a decision was made in favour of the Inland Revenue that the contributions made to the trust were of a capital nature and thus were not expended for the purposes of the company&#39s trade.


Because of the Revenue&#39s success in arguing that the payments should not be deductible from the profits of the trade the second point to be decided, namely how the payment should be properly relieved was never determined. If this point was to be determined then it would have been necessary to consider the tax implications of SSAP 2, FRS 5 and UITF 13. As stated, however, these points never came to be considered.


It is clear that in the Mawsley case the main reason why the contributions into the trust were not deductible was because it was proved that the primary purpose of establishing the trust was so that the trustees could buy the majority of the managing director&#39s shares on his retirement from the business and not to benefit the employees.


Of course, employees who were beneficiaries under the trust would benefit but the primary purpose was clearly to benefit the vendor.


Because of this the Revenue were successful in their argument that the payment into the trust was essentially capital and any benefits accruing the employees were in effect secondary.


As payments were essentially to fund the managing director`s retirement they really couldn&#39t be agreed to be for the purpose of the company&#39s trade.


It is absolutely essential, in the light of this case, that in establishing any employee trusts any purpose and this includes future purchase of shares perhaps funded by the proceeds of a life assurance policy that is held to an employee benefit trust, at all points especially as documented in the agreement the primary purpose must be and be seen to be to benefit the employees.


The above mentioned accountancy issues connected with SSAP 2, FRS 5 and UITF 13 still await determination. The essence of these, it is believed, is that once a payment is agreed to be for a Revenue purpose and is thus deductible normal accountancy principles should be taken into account in determining when the deduction should be given for tax purposes.


The basic principle of UITF 13 is that in the case of an employee benefit trust no deduction should be given until the shares (or on a wider reading, assets) are distributed for the benefit of the employees. The rationale is that until that time the assets in effect remain, for accountancy purposes at least, on the company&#39s books.


There is, currently, much talk round the use of employee benefit trusts for all sorts of reasons but it is absolutely essential that those involved in their construction or advising on them take full account of the Mawsley decision and the accountancy issues discussed above.

Recommended

Thesis launches Isas

Private client investment manager Thesis Asset Management has launched self-selecting mini and maxi Isas.The Isas give investors the choice of investing in any unit trust, corporate bonds or direct equities.There is a minimum investment requirement of £1,000 for both the mini and the maxi products.Thesis charges an initial fee of £75, although this is waived […]

Stakeholder could leave employees worse off warns Punter Southall & Co

Consulting actuaries Punter Southall & Co have warned that stakeholder pension proposals could leave employees worse off in retirement.The actuarial firm surveyed the UK&#39s top 200 companies to gauge their reaction to stakeholder proposals.The survey found nearly 60 per cent of respondents would review their existing occupational pension scheme arrangements with a view to simplifying […]

EMD fixes for two years

Exclusive Mortgages Direct has launched two fixed rate mortgages funded by Birmingham Midshires.Borrowers can choose between a two-year fix at 3.99 per cent with a 1 per cent cashback offering 95 per cent loan to value and a 4.99 per cent fix with 3 per cent cashback offering 90 per cent loan to valueBuildings insurance […]

Bacon & Woodrow calls for GPPs to qualify as stakeholder schemes

Bacon & Woodrow has called on the Government to allow Group Personal Pensions to qualify as stakeholder pensions in its response to the Green Paper.Plans should be allowed to qualify whether or not they have the appropriate trustee structure.The consultant also wants the Government to allow charges of more than one per cent for marketing […]

Global equities: time to de-risk?

While equity valuations have doubled since the financial crisis, Simon Edelsten explains that there are still pockets of value. But not where you might think Macro-economic uncertainty is causing turbulence in equity markets. Artemis Global Select Fund manager Simon Edelsten says his investment themes are taking him in a different direction to some of his peers – away […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment