View more on these topics

Roderic Rennison: Weighing up the merits of employed and self-employed advisers

Roderic Rennison of The Ideas LabThe choice between employment or self-employment needs careful consideration by advisers and the firms employing them.

A lot of debate has taken place over the years regarding the relative merits of advisers being self-employed versus employed. This article highlights some of the issues that I think need to be considered and confronts some of what I believe to be myths.

“It depends”
I do not think that it is “better” to employ advisers, as opposed to contracting with them on a self-employed basis. Rather, I think that it depends on the aspirations and attitude of the adviser, and the culture and effectiveness of the management of the organisation that wants to hire them.

Roderic Rennison: Enabling your advisers to buy your business

Some people argue that it is not possible to control advisers or to motivate them effectively unless they are employed. I don’t subscribe to this view; I have worked with companies where employed advisers were unwilling to conform and where they were unmotivated.

In my experience, it comes down to having a clear and compelling proposition, then providing the environment and the management in which to succeed – both of which need to be regularly reviewed and, when appropriate, updated.

Business owners who do not proactively manage their advisers are likely to be less successful financially, as the advisers, whether employed or self-employed, may drift away to firms where there is a sense of direction and purpose.

In my view, a centralised investment (and retirement) proposition is a prerequisite. When this and effective controls and management are in place, it is possible to have both employed and self-employed advisers working alongside each other (subject to the caveats below).

“The economics are clear”
It is often argued that it is more profitable to employ advisers than to have self-employed ones. Again, I think it depends.

The shortcoming of some firms is that they have never accurately costed and calculated the underlying profitability of the advisers that are in place, let alone what incoming advisers will cost.

Profit is not only dependent on different levels of business but also the types of business they advise on, the resources that they use and the way they use them.
Some firms have stuck with pay-aways for certain self-employed advisers, which are no longer viable in light of increased costs, for fear of losing them and have pay increase percentages based on volume.

There are no easy solutions; the reality of the situation needs to be established and a dialogue has to take place with advisers concerned.

Some will have been paid bonuses based on the misguided assumption that costs will always automatically fall as the level of adviser fees increases. This may be the case depending on the adviser, his or her level of personal organisation and the type of advice, but it does not automatically follow.

“We own the clients”
Some firms with employed advisers believe that they “own” clients and are in a stronger position than where there are self-employed advisers.

My experience tells me client retention has more to do with the strength of the firm’s proposition and the extent to which clients feel that they identify with it, as opposed to the individual adviser.

Roderic Rennison: 10 steps to a solid strategic plan

The restrictive covenants within adviser contracts can apply to those who are employed and self-employed alike; what is important is for the contracts to be both understood and accepted by the advisers. The only people who really own clients are the clients.

They can select their adviser and those who have moved on will nearly always be able to deal with clients who approach them, after 12 months or sometimes a shorter period. It is for the firm to demonstrate its continuing relevance where a client is deciding about moving with the adviser.

“The law is about to change”
This has been mooted both from an HM Revenue and Customs/level of taxation and employment law perspective for over 10 years. There has been some use of what are termed IR35 indemnity clauses to protect firms that take on self-employed advisers.

It is important for a firm to be clear in its adviser contracts what it expects of them, and for the advisers to be equally clear and to be prepared to take professional, legal and tax advice when needed.

“Communication is the key”
Good outcomes in terms of happy, productive advisers nearly always stem from an open and consultative approach by a firm’s directors or partners. That, combined with a strong culture that is client-focused along with effective management and clear direction, will be more likely to generate good outcomes and build embedded value than simply making the binary decision to have either self-employed or employed advisers, without taking other relevant aspects into account.

Roderic Rennison is director of Rennison Consulting

Recommended

9

Thousands duped out of pension savings by rogue advisers

Rogue advisers have caused savers to lose hundreds of thousands of pounds after being abandoned to a “Wild West” of pension rules, according to a Sunday Times report. Its report shows how some advisers have exploited the outdated laws and loopholes to lure unassuming investors into high-risk products, leaving them unprotected when dodgy bets have gone […]

Business-People-Walking-Motion-Leaving-700x450.jpg
2

Aegon platform tech boss resigns

Aegon chief digital officer Richard Denning, who is also in charge of platform development at the provider, has resigned. An Aegon spokesman says Denning is leaving to “have a break from corporate life”. According to his LinkedIn profile, Denning’s roles at Aegon include chief digital and transformation officer, chief operating officer for digital solutions and […]

Wells Street Journal: Pensions Regulator lobs a rotten Nest egg

Much has been made of the Government’s taxpayer funded campaign encouraging voters to back remaining in the EU. The Leave side predictably went ballastic when details emerged of the 14-page booklet sent to every household in the UK at a cost of £9m. Leading Brexiteers Boris Johnson and Nigel Farage also presumably received the handy […]

The best of both worlds

Business Development Manager Kim Nelson and Lead MPS Manager Steven Rooke discuss the direction of traffic towards investment solutions in the adviser market and the increased use of models as a complete client investment solution in an adviser’s business. They then discuss the active/passive debate, looking at both the history, investment process and implementation considerations […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. This is something I really don’t understand and perhaps Mr. Rennison can enlighten me (and perhaps others too).

    I thought that the Revenue regarded you as employed if you only worked for one employer (Pimlico Plumbers?). This is obviously the case with advisers (SJP as one example).

    You can be self employed if you run your own business and this is perhaps where the loophole lies. From what I see whether you call yourself a partner or an associate, you are still subject to a higher authority in your day to day business dealings (as is a Network member), whereas the true self-employed paddles his/her own canoe entirely.(both of course subject to Regulation).

    Perhaps on day HMRC will lower the boom.

Leave a comment

Close

Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com