View more on these topics

Emma Simon: Don’t be too quick to celebrate the end of bank ‘advice’

Emma Simon MM blog

So which is the best deal for consumers: being flogged second-rate and inappropriate investments and pensions, or not being sold such funds at all?

On the face of it you would think that consumers would be immeasurably better off without door-to-door salesman selling them inflexible with-profits plans, or “wealth managers” in bank branches persuading them to sink their money into dud Isa funds.

Over the past decade or so a combination of market forces coupled with the glacial pace of regulatory change has improved both the standard of investment products available – and the advice process sitting behind them.

Last week we saw the latest attempts to clean up this area. After a mystery shopping exercise, the Financial Services Authority revealed that the investment advice given by banks was “disappointing” and one high street bank – understood to be Santander – now faces enforcement action.

Of course it is not just Santander that has a long and inglorious track record here. Point the finger at any high street bank and they will have either sold their stock market-linked bonds to 80-year old grannies, ran leviathan-like Isa funds, that were beached in the bottom quartile, or flogged a narrow range of investments that were selectedsolely for the commission paid, rather than the value offered to their customers.

And that’s before we even get into the bonus schemes used to incentives “advisers” to sell these stinkers.

Santander is now currently retraining all of its investment advisers – and is reviewing the future of its bancassurance arm.

There is a serious possibility that it will follow Barclays’ lead and stop offering investment advice altogether; or like RBS and HSBC only offer this service to its wealthiest customers.

Will consumers be better off as a result? A couple of years ago I would have probably have said yes. After all I’ve lost count of the number of articles I have read – and written – that caution consumers against ever buying any investment product from a bank.

But now I am not so sure. If banks high street banks like Barclays pull out of the advice market altogether, won’t this just mean far fewer people have any long term savings at all?

When I was a child, once a month – usually just as we sat down to dinner – a salesman from the Co-op called to collect the savings subs from my Gran. And she usually had a polite chat with him while the dinner went cold.

When I left university, I was given the proceeds of one of these saving plans. It was not a fortune, but paid off my student overdraft, and helped with the first two months’ rent in London.

I have no idea what the annualised return on this plan was, nor whether it represented value for money. But I do know that if my Gran had not saved at all I would have struggled. And I wonder whether she would have started – and more importantly continued – this savings plan without the ill-timed knock each month.

Thanks to the law of unintended consequences there is a real chance that bank salesmen will go the way of the man from the Pru (or Co-op).

Let us be clear, I am not suggesting that this should be used as an excuse for not improving both the standard of advice or products sold.

But let us be realistic. This process has driven up costs – and is rapidly pushing the cost of decent financial advice out of the reach of the mass market.

Perhaps the new FCA should also look at what can be done to fill this vacuum, so there can be a more satisfactory answer to the two stark alternatives that are mentioned above.

Emma Simon is deputy personal finance editor at the Telegraph Media Group

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

There are 7 comments at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. Inflexible with-profit plans? Bit of a blanket statement, perhaps you may wish to enlarge?

  2. Sorry, I read the rest and see that you kind of did enlarge…With a contradiction, by stating that you benefitted greatly from one of these presumably inflexible plans, so well done to the salesman. For the record, the return will have been robust if it was prior to 2000.

    I know what you are trying to say and by and large you make many good points, but why start an article by trying to pour scorn on the mechanisms and people who encouraged saving and for whose absence many people will now be worse off, that is a cheap shot and better left to another writer!

  3. @ Emma… methinks you are merely trying to ingratiate yourself to the adviser masses.

    There’s no need to go over old ground yet again (yaaawn) about inconsistent bank advice, to make your point that there’s many people who’ll be worse off not having access to an adviser.

    I agree with the point you’re making but not the dodgy tactics used to attract readers’ attentions.

  4. Where were all these journalists when RDR was first proposed – pouring scorn on IFA’s who pointed out the flaws in RDR that’s where.

  5. Good article Emma, but as others are highlighting many of us who were critical of RDR are still here and REMAIN critical, those who have left are often good advisers, but out is funny how the ONLY pure RDR name who looks likely to remain at the FCA is Rory Percival. Good on him for sticking with it, but rather than take all the flack in isolation. it would be good to hear him comment on those who abandoned ship!

  6. P.s The banks were the best positioned distribution method for simply guidance (not simplified advice) and for this failure alone, Hector Sants has been as bad as Fred Goodwin and should never have been given a Kinghthood

  7. And now that the man from the Pru doesn’t go round collecting on Friday nights, having a nice chat with Granny, he has been replaced by the muscle money boys who, instead of having a cup of tea will break Granny’s arm if she can’t pay. Couple that wih the tragedy that is PayDay loans at astronomical rates of interest and the ‘benefits’ of the sort of regulatory damage the industry has had to endure for over 12 years or so are thrown into stark relief!

    Frankly it is a disgrace!

Leave a comment