View more on these topics

Embarking up the wrong tree

Decision trees? It depends a lot on your understanding of the word

“decision” it seems.

The sample decision trees published by the FSA really do serve to

highlight the enormous difficulties people in this country face when they

come up against our pension system.

Take some time to put yourself in the place of two ordinary people trying

to use these trees to sort out their pensions. Eric is 55 years old and an

unemployed labourer. He lives in rented accommodation, has no savings at

all, is in debt to the bank and has no life insurance. Nevertheless, Eric

feels he ought to do something about his retirement.

He gets hold of a copy of the decision trees and starts, as recommended,

by reading all the introductory stuff. He can read all the words but their

intricate meanings probably don&#39t register with him. It&#39s a bit like

reading an A-level maths paper.

So, he goes on to the trees themselves – the ones for those not in

employment. The first one asks him if he has any existing pension

arrangements other than state ones. He answers no. So far, so good. He now

goes to the second tree.

This one is difficult but he struggles on to the box that asks if he can

save at least £20 a month for his retirement. He wants to, particularly

because the chart shows that this willincrease his pension by £19 a month,

which will come in handy later in life. The next box tells him to consider

starting a stakeholder pension.

In real life, when he gets to 65, he will probably get something like

£67.50 a week as a state pension, £4.75 a week from his stakeholder, a

top-up of £6.20 a week to get him to the minimum income guarantee and a bit

of help with his rent and council tax from the state, too.

In effect, Eric&#39s savings will have been taxed at 100 per cent and will

have been about as useful an investment as taking a £20 note from his

pocket each month for 10 years and setting fire to it.

Now, I know all this information is right there in the notes that

accompany the trees but it is not easy for people like Eric who are not

members of the pension priesthood to understand.

What Eric really needs is a tree that asks him the kind of questions

needed to make even a rudimentary attempt at understanding his situation,

eventually leading to a box that says: “You would be seriously stupid to

consider saving in a pension” or something like that.

It&#39s not just Eric though. What about Barry? Barry is employed and is able

to become a member of an occupational pension scheme which provides 1/60th

of final salary for each year of service. He gets hold of the decision

trees for employed persons to check out his options.

Barry is asked if his employer offers a company pension scheme. He answers

yes. He is then asked when he can join. He answers that he can join now or

in the near future.

The tree then asks: “Does your employer pay in contributions to the

scheme?” This is a strange question really as it is illegal for employers

to set up occupational schemes and not pay in to them. But the question is

there, so Barry answers it. He answers no.

In fact, his employer is taking a contribution holiday because the scheme

is in such good financial shape. But everyone in the factory is talking

about it. They are all worried becausethe employer has stopped paying.

It&#39s a short step from here for Barry to slip down the part of the tree that gets him taking out a stakeholder pension.

There are 60 million people like Eric and Barry in this country, all with

different personal circumstances, all needing specific individual advice,

particularly on financial issues.

To be fair, the decision trees acknowledge this. On every page, they carry

the warning: “The decision trees are designed to help you make your own

choice regarding your pension arrangements. They do not constitute and

should not be taken to constitute financial or other professional advice.

You should get help if you require advice.” Quite.

Perspective, p24;

Decision trees, p36


A Consumer&#39s View

As the date for the introduction of stakeholder pensions looms, there mustbe quite a few IFAs concerned over how they will survive. Stakeholder willhave a profound effect both on product providersand IFAs withsubstantialpension business.The maximum 1 per cent annual charge on stakeholder will very rapidlybecome the norm for all pension policies.Who will want to buy […]

Review of FSAVCs may see advisers facing flood of claims

The FSA&#39s review of FSAVCs could open the floodgates for claims againstindependent advisers.The fears come after the review, announced this week, emphasised it wouldhave to review all cases that investors request in addition to those insome specified categories.Firms will also have to review sales made between April 29, 1988 andAugust 15, 1999. The FSA says […]

Virgin targets the &#39forgotten&#39 GPP market

IFAs&#39 share of the stakeholder market is being threatened by the entry ofVirgin Direct into the lucrative group personal pension market.Virgin claims employers are the forgotten customers and have beenneglected by intermediaries and pension scheme providers, a claim angrilydenied by IFAs.Virgin&#39s new service will be an internet-based pension operation free toemployers.The company says it is […]

Panorama failed to take in whole picture

What a pity about the BBC&#39s Panorama Mortgage Timebomb programme lastweek. I was expecting a serious in-depth analysis of endowment policies,about what percentage of them are likely to fail to repay the mortgage andan actuarial comparison between the total costs of endowment and repaymentmortgages.Instead, we were treated to a number of examples of the failure […]

Value for money in DC pensions

The Pension Policy Institute (PPI)’s recent report “Value for money in DC pensions” tries to identify factors by which people can assess whether their pension offers fair value for money (VFM). Fiona Tait provides an overview of the findings. Positive Outcomes It is extremely hard to assess VFM in a pension. Press activity naturally focuses […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


    Leave a comment


    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers. Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm