View more on these topics

Electronic avenue

Today&#39s market is being pushed and pulled in all directions. Meeting corporate governance and compliance demands, and delivering innovative products as well as meeting customer expectations are all exerting immeasurable pressure on product providers.

More and more are finding themselves caught up in the tide of charges for missold policies and the compensation claims it provoked, adding to the pain. The knock on effect for the industry is a deluge of legislation. Now more than ever companies must find extra resource from already tight budgets. This can only be achieved by reducing costs and improving potential and existing revenues. But in such a competitive environment, are these realistic ambitions? The answer is yes, but it will require a systematic review of all processes.

The one process that mortgage providers should be looking at closely is securitisation, especially as the 2006 Basel II deadline looms. Compliance to the frameworks it sets out for measuring capital adequacy will rest on the ability to increase or dispose of financial assets. As increasing capital is expensive, especially if process re-engineering is not on the board&#39s agenda, many will find securitisation to be a saviour on two counts – liquidity previously not available and an improved risk profile.

The flexibility such financing provides will also take away some of the pressure to create innovative new products and cut costs. Bondholders have a secure investment in an attractive yield and the borrower can access more competitive mortgages.

However, securitisation as a process demands a high level of administrative expertise and the free exchange of intellectual property. Technology will inherently play a significant part in this but lenders must take care that the technology in place maximises the full potential of securitised asset management. Much of the success will rest on the lender&#39s ability to provide credit rating agencies with accurate information from which to complete a due diligence review.

If lenders held this information in an electronic format, the process of assessment for each securitised loan has the potential to be very efficient. Agencies should have access to readily available information such as the geographical spread of assets, loan to value, credit risk exposure, solvency levels and underwriting policies to evaluate the level of risk to rate the asset pool.

Alas, currently few lenders hold this information electronically and so cannot provide credit ratings agencies with the data they require to make precise risk calculations. In the absence of comprehensive data the agencies have no choice but to make conservative estimations that downgrade the value of the portfolio. Clearly, lenders are losing money before they even start.

Having electronic information available is also important if the agency is to later monitor performance and maintain and adjust ratings and accurately reflect an asset pool&#39s attractiveness to investors.

But in reality the process is blighted by inaccurate and incomplete information not just at the assessment stage but throughout the asset pool&#39s life.

Is it not ridiculous that in a computer generation few lenders have the systems that allow them to provide such levels of accuracy and transparency? If an electronic record of the loan file was available, the values that providers could command, and potentially over longer periods, would significantly improve in the vast majority of cases.

The benefits of turning paper-based processes into inherently compliant electronic processes do not stop at securitisation. There is an opportunity for lenders to reduce their cost bases drastically across the business if information is always captured and made easily accessible.

Holding records electronically will reduce administration and processing costs by providing transparency throughout loan origination, completion and loan servicing. But more than that, a complete audit trail of an application through to termination will exist. For those providers caught up in the endowment crisis, this kind of transparency could be saving them millions.

The lessons learnt from this disaster and others, have provoked the financial governing bodies to consider how such events will be avoided in the future. The onslaught of legislation to protect the consumer and the industry will inevitable rest on transaction audits. Increasing transparency has to be an integral part of all business and operational strategies and processes in the future.

Of course, aside from operational benefits, customers will be happier as their requests can be dealt with efficiently at any point in the policy&#39s life. And in today&#39s lending market where customers can show their displeasure by changing horses easily – a happy customer can only be good for business. Aside from this, the agent&#39s life gets easier, stress goes down and staff retention goes up.

If so many benefits can be derived from one simple objective – maximising the value of securitised assets – surely, the benefits of changing all processes could be colossal. With shareholder value, consumer confidence and corporate reputation all at stake – is it not time that companies woke up to the harm they could do if they do not invest in solutions that will enable them to reduce costs and meet compliance demands?

Recommended

BBNEB launches specialist group risk team

Berry Birch & Noble Employee Benefits a BBB subsidiary is launching a specialist group risk team to provide advisers with group medical insurance, group income protection and group life policies.

Fidelity net retail sales plummet to just £7m

Fidelity&#39s net retail sales reached just £7m in the third quarter, placing it outside the top 10 biggest retail sellers for the first time in almost five years, according to a confidential report. The giant fund firm achieved retail sales of £363m but redemptions hit £356m, leaving it trailing behind rivals such as Threadneedle and […]

Fur flies over Expo bunnies

The behaviour of some exhibitors at last week&#39s Mortgage Expo in London has been branded as totally unacceptable by leading industry figures. Prudential national mortgage club manager John Malone feels so let down that he intends to write to the organisers to ask for his money back. Expo saw Majestic Mortgages trying to entice brokers […]

Ship chief defends NU over equity plan

Safe Home Income Plans chairman Jon King has responded to concerns raised by a mortgage broker over the fairness and simplicity of Norwich Union&#39s equity-release mortgage. Mortgage Portfolio Services principal Simon Chalk wrote to Ship a few weeks ago, asking it to review NU&#39s membership after he and Charcol senior technical manager Ray Boulger criticised […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment

    Close

    Why register with Money Marketing ?

    Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

    News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
    Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

    Money Marketing Events
    Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

    Research and insight
    Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

    Have your say
    Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

    Register now

    Having problems?

    Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

    Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm

    Email: customerservices@moneymarketing.com