View more on these topics

Election Countdown: Independence is important for the public

As a general philosophy, the Liberal Democrats are committed to a competitive marketplace in which customers have real freedom of choice to obtain the best quality product at the cheapest price.

In practice, though, competition is often deficient and consumers are taken advantage of. Rip-off Britain is alive and kicking. Sectors where the products are complex or are sold to vulnerable consumers are particularly at risk of “misselling” and the associated bad publicity.

While a substantial number of additional regulatory burdens have been introduced during this Parliament, including a degree of consumer credit legislation and the creation of the Financial Services Authority, there has been a notable absence of regulations specifically to protect vulnerable consumers. Addressing the issue of protection of vulnerable should be a key concern for the next Parliament.

In the area of mortgage regulation, the Government has been dilatory.

It is anomalous that mortgages are not regulated by the FSA. This is despite known serious abuse in the industry – the usual abuse being the cross-selling of mortgages with insurance products.

The Financial Services Bill committee recommended mortgages to be brought within the remit of the FSA. However, the Government has only recently and grudgingly acted to replace the bank&#39s voluntary code.

An action for the next Parliament would be to agree to the amendment I introduced to the Financial Services Bill to bring mortgage advice and lending within the legislation.

In the area of endowment mortgages I have been dissatisfied with the responses of the Govern-ment and the FSA which have been in marked contrast to their approach to pension “misselling”.

Yet many people have been left high and dry when they cannot repay their mortgage because their endowment policy has underperformed. This is an extensive problem and consumers now need a system that provides speedy redress in relation to the insurers and banks responsible.

Turning next to the FSA, I welcome the idea of a unified statutory regulatory body for with-profits institutions. I do, however, question its effectiveness in the role of protecting the consumer. The recent Equitable Life debacle has highlighted grave weaknesses in the protection offered by financial services regulation.

Financial services companies struggle with an over-complicated rulebook and the officials regulating them do not necessarily understand the industry. This needs to be addressed.

As a spokesman for the organisation Save our Building Societies, I believe strongly in diversity of ownership in the financial services sector. The concept of mutuality has conveyed significant benefits investors and borrowers.

Mutuals have had a good track record of consumer service, particularly in the area of mortgages. The sector has suffered significant erosion, particularly the insurance and building society sectors, from the actions of carpetbaggers.

I have pressed for legislation for greater protection for mutuals from the capricious attacks of carpetbaggers without under- mining the rights of mutual owners. This is an issue that should be taken up in the next Parliament.

Finally, on the important issue of insurance polarisation I believe that genuine independence of independent financial advisers is important for consumers.

The proposed relaxation of the polarisation rules would effectively make IFAs the scapegoat for some of the abuses that have occurred in big financial institutions. Polarisation should be maintained for the benefit of consumers.

In conclusion, the next Parliament could keep itself usefully busy as the champion of consumer protection.

Recommended

1976 and all that

So what? Well, 1976 is a year from which one cannot escape at present. For example, the result of Preston v Wolverhampton. No, not another football analogy but a sex discrimination case about pensions involving the Wolverhampton Healthcare NHS Trust. The result is that successful claimants who pay their share of backdated pension contributions may […]

Aberdeen Asset Managers – Aberdeen Growth VCT 1

Monday, 9 April. Aim: Growth by investing in unquoted companies and those listed on AIM.Minimum investment: £3,000.Opening-closing date: January 22, 2001-April 30, 2001.Charges: Initial 5 per cent, annual 2 per cent in years one and two, 2.5 per cent thereafter.Commission: Initial 3 per cent, renewal 0.5 per cent in first 3 years for brokers placing […]

Employer guide to stakeholder survival

The Confederation of British Industry and law firm Hammond Suddards Edge have produced an employer&#39s guide to stakeholder. The stakeholder survival guide is aimed at helping businesses legally bound to offer the new pension scheme, helping them educate employees about the need to make provision for their retirement. The booklet explains the new obligations on […]

Imro reprimands specialist fund manager

IMRO has reprimanded defunct fund manager Trafalgar Asset Management for issuing a misleading brochure when it was still in existence. The specialist fund manager, which went into liquidation in October 2000, was guilty of claiming Hobbs Melville Asset Management, which it was formerly called, was part of the Hobbs Melville Group, an unregulated firm it […]

Newsletter

News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up

Comments

    Leave a comment