View more on these topics

Editor’s note: Why the longstop debate just will not disappear

The Financial Advice Market Review in 2016 was supposed to kill off the debate about whether advisers should have unlimited liability for complaints at the Financial Ombudsman Service.

The data just did not warrant putting a formal time limit on complaints, the FCA ruled. Too few complaints actually dated back to more than 15 years ago. Very few of those were successful and that minority was centred on issues like mortgage endowments, which are dwindling with time anyway, and on which there is pretty much unanimous agreement that there was widespread misselling that merits compensation.

Regardless, the FOS’s rules clearly stipulate that consumers are time-barred if they bring their case more than three years after they could have reasonably known they would have had a cause for a complaint, or six years after the event itself.

But a whole host of developments means the longstop is a debate worth revisiting today. Firstly, advisers are worried that defined benefit transfer complaints could fill the hole left by mortgage endowment redress. Professional indemnity insurers are coming under more pressure. Margins for advice firms, and therefore reserves to pay potential FOS bills, have ticked down (albeit only very slightly). The new adviser trade body, Pimfa, may not be as dedicated to the cause as its predecessors, Apfa. The FOS recently underwent its own review of internal processes after a Channel 4 documentary made allegations of sloppy decision making.

Earlier this month, the FCA turned the pressure up by announcing plans to increase the maximum payouts the FOS could award, as well as to extend access to small and medium-sized businesses.

Does this finally tip the scales in favour of introducing a formal time limit on complaints?

Cover story: How long can advisers last without a longstop?

It’s not just something that angers small advisers. Zurich put its weight behind the Fair Liability 4 Advice campaign with early financial planning trade body Aifa. Major networks like Intrinsic, Tenet and Lighthouse all lent their support to it too.

This support has fizzled out. But the argument the profession can continue to play, whatever the merits of the longstop, is that trust in financial advice, and the need to recruit new blood, is more important than ever.

It is not strictly speaking true, but the perception for entrants to the profession that they could be on the hook for complaints for an indeterminate amount of time is probably not the greatest advertisement to become a financial planner.

Even if the FCA won’t overturn the decision and introduce a longstop, we should at least raise awareness of exactly when consumers will be barred from going to the FOS, and enforce those timeframes diligently.

Justin Cash is editor of Money Marketing. Follow him on Twitter @Justin_Cash_1


Modern love

Amanda Docherty – Marketing Manager, Royal London When two of my closest friends recently told me they were having a baby I was over the moon for them. I was chatting to my mum about it and she asked me if they were married yet or whether they were planning to get married. They weren’t but […]

Scottish Widows hands £30bn fund contract to BlackRock after kicking Standard Life Aberdeen off mandate

BlackRock has won a bidding war to manage £30bn of Scottish Widows’ index strategies after parent company Lloyds terminated a major contract with Standard Life Aberdeen to run the money. Aberdeen Asset Management had managed nearly £110bn in Scottish Widows Investment Partnership funds prior to its merger with Standard Life. However, Lloyds said it thought […]

China’s economic bounce may already be over

By Mike Riddell (17 May 2016) Most people would explain the rally in global risky assets since mid-February as being primarily down to the spectacular volte-face from the Federal Reserve, where Janet Yellen (and others) dramatically toned down their narrative that the Fed would be hiking rates as many as four times in 2016. This explanation […]


News and expert analysis straight to your inbox

Sign up


There is one comment at the moment, we would love to hear your opinion too.

  1. The longstop isn’t just a debate worth revisiting today ~ it’s a debate that, in many quarters, has never gone away. The reason why PIMFA isn’t prepared to take up the reins is APFA’s humiliating defeat (the final nail in its coffin) after years of campaigning followed by months of having made what turned out to be wholly misplaced statements of optimism that the FCA was looking set, finally, to give ground on the issue. All the FCA was doing, in reality, was stringing APFA along, with no real intention of giving an inch. Clear, fair and not misleading? I hardly think so.

    As a result, financial advisers are, effectively, unlike any other profession, liable for ever and a day advice that may have been given decades ago and which will haunt them ’til their dying day, like the sword of Damocles. What a horrible environment in which to have to try to earn an honest living.

Leave a comment


Why register with Money Marketing ?

Providing trusted insight for professional advisers.  Since 1985 Money Marketing has helped promote and analyse the financial adviser community in the UK and continues to be the trusted industry brand for independent insight and advice.

News & analysis delivered directly to your inbox
Register today to receive our range of news alerts including daily and weekly briefings

Money Marketing Events
Be the first to hear about our industry leading conferences, awards, roundtables and more.

Research and insight
Take part in and see the results of Money Marketing's flagship investigations into industry trends.

Have your say
Only registered users can post comments. As the voice of the adviser community, our content generates robust debate. Sign up today and make your voice heard.

Register now

Having problems?

Contact us on +44 (0)20 7292 3712

Lines are open Monday to Friday 9:00am -5.00pm